Tests 79 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,130 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 31 road tests and 2,130 + 907 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Ventus S1 evo2 72, Azenis FK510 73.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 9 tests that measured dry braking for both, Ventus S1 evo2 won 6 and Azenis FK510 won 1 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
- In 9 tests that measured wet braking for both, Ventus S1 evo2 won 0 and Azenis FK510 won 9 (average 95% vs 99% of the best).
- In 8 tests that measured wet handling for both, Ventus S1 evo2 won 0 and Azenis FK510 won 6 (average 98% vs 98% of the best).
- In 7 tests that measured dry handling for both, Ventus S1 evo2 won 5 and Azenis FK510 won 1 (average 98% vs 97% of the best).
- In 5 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Ventus S1 evo2 won 3 and Azenis FK510 won 2 (average 95% vs 96% of the best).
-
74
Dry
Level74Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 28 tests 77 73 Reviews found online 70 75 Dry Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 6–1 97% 96% Dry Handling (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 5–1 98% 97% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 80% 80% Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 70 = 74
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 74
-
79
Wet
Azenis FK510 +685Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 29 tests 83 89 Reviews found online 73 78 Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–2 95% 96% Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 80% 80% Wet Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 0–9 95% 99% Wet Handling (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 0–6 98% 98% Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 73.4 = 79
Azenis FK510: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.2 = 85
-
–
Snow
No comparison55Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online – 46 Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
Ventus S1 evo2 +957Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests 72 42 Reviews found online 63 68 Ventus S1 evo2: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 62.8 = 66
Azenis FK510: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 67.6 = 57
-
72
Noise
Ventus S1 evo2 +666Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 18 tests 76 66 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) 67 Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–2 99% 99% Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72
Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.2 = 66
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
Azenis FK510 +465Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 57 54 Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.1 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Azenis FK510 +472Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 Azenis FK510 Reviews found online 68 72 -
72
Efficiency
Ventus S1 evo2 +2151Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 19 tests 72 51 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–0 96% 91%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 73 |
| Dry | 74 | 74 |
| Wet | 79 | 85 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | 66 | 57 |
| Noise | 72 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 72 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Ventus S1 evo2
73
/ 100
Azenis FK510
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 14 tests that ran both, Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 finished ahead 9 times and Falken Azenis FK510 5 times.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus S1 evo2 | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% | 96% | +0.9 | 6–1 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 97% | +0.4 | 5–1 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 80% | 80% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 95% | 96% | −0.4 | 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% | 99% | −3.8 | 0–9 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 98% | −0.8 | 0–6 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 80% | 80% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 86% #4/11 · 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tyre Test | 70% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 99% | +0.4 | 2–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 96% | 91% | +5.2 | 3–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 69% | 79% | −10.3 | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/10 | #7/10 | – | 9–5 in 14 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus S1 evo2
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip performance
- Strong value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin or Continental
- Crisp steering response and confident cornering handling
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-performance vehicles
- Increased road noise and harsher ride quality as the tire ages and tread depth lowers
- Occasional reports of structural weaknesses such as sidewall bulges or cracking
Tire B Azenis FK510
Pros
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Falken Azenis FK510
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2022-02-08
“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”
r/TeslaModel3
·1 upvote ·2024-02-10
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
corvetteforum.com
“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”
Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving
Based on 63 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 61 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 51 | 51 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
73
/ 100
Falken Azenis FK510
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 and Falken Azenis FK510 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 is stronger on efficiency, comfort and noise. Falken Azenis FK510 is stronger on wet and treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 72 vs 51 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 66 vs 57 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 72 vs 66 on noise.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 85 vs 79 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus S1 evo2 or Azenis FK510?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus S1 evo2 or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 85 vs 79 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus S1 evo2 or Azenis FK510?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Ventus S1 evo2 or Azenis FK510?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 72 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus S1 evo2 or Azenis FK510?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 66 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus S1 evo2 or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Ventus S1 evo2 or Azenis FK510?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 72 vs 51 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology