tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 3 road tests and 2,129 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus S1 evo2 is ahead, 72–64

Check price on Amazon · Ventus S1 evo2 or N Fera SU1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Tire AHankook

Ventus S1 evo2

Summer

± 5

Tests 79 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,129 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 63 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo2 +15
    59
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 2 tests7755
    Reviews found online7064

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 70 = 74

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.2 = 59

  2. 79

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo2 +15
    64
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 2 tests8362
    Reviews found online7367

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 73.4 = 79

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.3 = 64

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–50

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7266
    Reviews found online6366

    Ventus S1 evo2: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 62.8 = 66

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65.5 = 66

  5. 72

    Noise

    Ventus S1 evo2 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests7669
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)70

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.8 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5759

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus S1 evo2 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1
    Reviews found online6866
  8. 72

    Efficiency

    N Fera SU1 +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests7276
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evo2Nexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 72 64
Dry 74 59
Wet 79 64
Snow – 58
Comfort 66 66
Noise 72 69
Treadwear 61 66
Handling (owners) 68 66
Efficiency 72 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ventus S1 evo2

± 8

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus S1 evo2N Fera SU1ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test 94% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #7/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test 95% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 80% #4/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 95% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% #2/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test 98% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 93% #3/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test 95% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 80% #8/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 86% #4/11 · 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tyre Test 97% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 100% #1/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test 99% #2/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/10 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test #5/6 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus S1 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip performance
  • Strong value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin or Continental
  • Crisp steering response and confident cornering handling

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-performance vehicles
  • Increased road noise and harsher ride quality as the tire ages and tread depth lowers
  • Occasional reports of structural weaknesses such as sidewall bulges or cracking
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo2 review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6197
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common5151

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

Nexen N Fera SU1

Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — better dry, wet and noise. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if treadwear and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 74 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 79 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 76 vs 72 on efficiency.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus S1 evo2 or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus S1 evo2 or N Fera SU1?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 79 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus S1 evo2 or N Fera SU1?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus S1 evo2 or N Fera SU1?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 72 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus S1 evo2 or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ventus S1 evo2 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ventus S1 evo2 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 76 vs 72 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology