Nexen CP641 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 0 road tests and 3,359 + 48 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo3 is ahead, 70–57
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 19 tests Owners 56 · 3,359 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 48 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests | 86 | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 49 |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75
CP641: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55
No road tests of dry for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests | 90 | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 52 |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 67.5 = 81
CP641: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 51 |
CP641: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 58
No road tests of snow for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 65 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 52 |
Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 55.4 = 59
CP641: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 52.3 = 58
No road tests of comfort for CP641. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 59 |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
CP641: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for CP641. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 61 | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 40 | 53 |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.4 = 53
CP641: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 58 | 52 |
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests | 68 | – |
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | Nexen CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 57 |
| Dry | 75 | 55 |
| Wet | 81 | 57 |
| Snow | – | 58 |
| Comfort | 59 | 58 |
| Noise | 73 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 52 |
| Efficiency | 68 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus S1 evo3
CP641
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
“F/S Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 235/35 R19 Hi Guys Selling a full set (4) Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 235/35 R19 summer tires, with 9/32 tread depth which is exactly the same depth when these ultra high performance tires are new. No punctures anywhere. Tires came of my 2024 VW GTI with less than 3k miles on the odometer. The production date on the tires is 3324 which means 33rd week of 2024.This translates to late August 2024. $500/obo but no shipping. Local pick up only. I am in Long Island NY. Message if interested. Read more”
“Which tire should I choose? I’m currently looking for new summer tires, but this time I’m finding it surprisingly difficult to choose. My previous set were Bridgestone T005s, which honestly didn’t impress me much. On my earlier car I’ve driven on Michelin PS4S, Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3, and Pirelli (don’t remember the exact model). The Michelins were by far my favorite — excellent grip and overall a fantastic tire. The Hankooks were above average and perfectly fine, but the Pirellis were a big disappointment. This time I’m considering the following three options: • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 • Continental SportContact 7 • Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 If I hadn’t done any research, I would have gone for the Michelins without hesitation. However, after digging a bit deeper, I added the Continentals as a strong competitor, and the Kumhos because they’re significantly cheaper while still getting quite positive reviews. I drive a Cupra Formentor 2.0 AWD with around 430 hp. I never take the car to the track, but I do enjoy sporty driving and quick launches at traffic lights. Now I’m finding the final decision harder than expected. Taking both price and performance into account, which of these three would you recommend? Read more”
“Nice. I'm in Texas, so I'm not sure if those (as all seasons) would be the best choice for me. I will never drive in snow/ice, and have been leaning towards the Hankook Ventus S1 EVO3 for my Model 3 AWD with 19" wheels. Those are the only Tesla OEM (I prefer the Tesla specs like acoustic lining, tread width, extra sidewall stability, etc.) summer tires in the 19" size.”
Based on 33 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | B · Nexen CP641 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 110 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 400 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 55,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Nexen CP641
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet, dry and noise. Pick the Nexen CP641 if treadwear matters most to you.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 57 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 55 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 73 vs 64 on noise.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 58 vs 52 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 57 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 55 on our dry score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 73 vs 64 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 58 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Nexen CP641, 58 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
