Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Alpin 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 16 + 3 road tests and 22 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Winter i cept evo3 78, Alpin 5 77.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
± 4

Tests 76 · 16 tests Owners 82 · 22 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Michelin Alpin 5
Tire BMichelin

Alpin 5

Winter

± 6

Tests 74 · 3 tests Owners 81 · 31 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (wear)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo3 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests7670
    Reviews found online8277

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 82.3 = 78

    Alpin 5: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 77.1 = 73

  2. 90

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo3 +7
    83
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / 3 tests9380
    Reviews found online8687

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 86.4 = 90

    Alpin 5: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 86.8 = 83

  3. 80

    Snow

    Winter i cept evo3 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / 3 tests8069
    Reviews found online8080

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 80.2 = 80

    Alpin 5: 60% × 68.8 + 40% × 79.5 = 73

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Alpin 5 +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7479

    Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 70.2 + 60% × 73.9 = 72

    Alpin 5: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 78.6 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for Alpin 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 33

    Noise

    Alpin 5 +29
    62
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests1060
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 33

    Alpin 5: 60% × 59.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 78

    Treadwear

    Alpin 5 +5
    83
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests7783
    Reviews found online8184

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 80.7 = 78

    Alpin 5: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 83.7 = 83

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i cept evo3 +3
    78
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5
    Reviews found online8178
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    Winter i cept evo3 +8
    59
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests6759
Scores at a glance
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Alpin 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Winter i cept evo3Michelin Alpin 5
Relative Score 78 77
Dry 78 73
Wet 90 83
Snow 80 73
Comfort 72 76
Noise 33 62
Treadwear 78 83
Handling (owners) 81 78
Efficiency 67 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Winter i cept evo3

± 6

Alpin 5

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryWinter i cept evo3Alpin 5ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #9/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test 96% #7/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #9/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 99% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 94% #11/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test 95% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 96% #7/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test 92% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #9/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 98% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 95% #13/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test 95% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #3/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 96% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 93% #30/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test 95% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 89% #3/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 87% #13/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 76% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 90% #3/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test 68% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #9/20 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test #13/20 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 79% #4/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #4/31 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test #2/11 2019 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter i cept evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
  • Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
  • Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear

Cons

  • Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
  • Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
  • Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo3 review

Tire B Alpin 5

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and winter conditions
  • Outstanding wet-weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
  • High ride comfort and remarkably low noise levels for a winter tire

Cons

  • Soft rubber compound struggles in warm temperatures (above 20°C–25°C), causing cornering smear
  • Soft sidewalls reduce precision during aggressive dry handling
  • Potential increase in noise and hardening of the rubber compound after 3 years of use
All owner themes in the Alpin 5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 B · Michelin Alpin 5
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8617
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Michelin Alpin 5

Too close to call: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 and Michelin Alpin 5 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is stronger on efficiency, wet and snow. Michelin Alpin 5 is stronger on noise, treadwear and comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Alpin 5 scores 62 vs 33 on noise.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 67 vs 59 on efficiency.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 90 vs 83 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 80 vs 73 on snow.

Tire A · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Tire B · Michelin Alpin 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5?

Which is better in the wet, Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 90 vs 83 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 80 vs 73 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5?

Michelin Alpin 5, 62 vs 33 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5?

Michelin Alpin 5, 76 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5?

Michelin Alpin 5, 83 vs 78 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Winter i cept evo3 or Alpin 5?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 67 vs 59 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology