Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X vs Gislaved Nord Frost 200 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 3 road tests and 2 + 0 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Winter i cept IZ3 X 69, Nord Frost 200 70.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X
± 8Provisional

Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 70 · 2 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 8 in 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Gislaved Nord Frost 200
Tire BGislaved

Nord Frost 200

Winter

± 9

Tests 70 · 3 tests Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Winter i cept IZ3 X +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7466
    Reviews found online70≈ 67 (est.)

    Winter i cept IZ3 X: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 69.5 = 72

    Nord Frost 200: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of dry for Nord Frost 200. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Nord Frost 200 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests6071
    Reviews found online74≈ 71 (est.)

    Winter i cept IZ3 X: 60% × 59.6 + 40% × 74.1 = 65

    Nord Frost 200: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 70.6 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of wet for Nord Frost 200. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Nord Frost 200 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests6771
    Reviews found online71≈ 71 (est.)

    Winter i cept IZ3 X: 60% × 67.4 + 40% × 71.4 = 69

    Nord Frost 200: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 70.5 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of snow for Nord Frost 200. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    Winter i cept IZ3 X: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Winter i cept IZ3 X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    Nord Frost 200 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6773
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Winter i cept IZ3 X: 60% × 67 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 67

    Nord Frost 200: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept IZ3 X or Nord Frost 200. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Winter i cept IZ3 X: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter i cept IZ3 X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200
    Reviews found online70–
  8. 75

    Efficiency

    Winter i cept IZ3 X +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7570
Scores at a glance
Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X vs Gislaved Nord Frost 200: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Winter i cept IZ3 XGislaved Nord Frost 200
Relative Score 69 70
Dry 72 67
Wet 65 71
Snow 69 71
Comfort 69 –
Noise 67 71
Treadwear 67 –
Handling (owners) 70 –
Efficiency 75 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Winter i cept IZ3 X

± 9

Nord Frost 200

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryWinter i cept IZ3 XNord Frost 200ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #4/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test 98% #5/8 · 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 88% #6/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test 99% #3/8 · 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 96% #6/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test 99% #3/8 · 2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Handling Snow 91% #7/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test 92% #5/8 · 2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Traction Snow 92% #7/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test 71% #5/8 · 2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 98% #7/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test 98% #7/8 · 2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 99% #5/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test 94% #6/8 · 2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #6/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test 98% #3/8 · 2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/8 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test #6/8 2021 Moottori Winter Studded Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X B · Gislaved Nord Frost 200
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2853
Rim diameters17″ – 21″13″ – 20″
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X

Gislaved Nord Frost 200

Too close to call: Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X and Gislaved Nord Frost 200 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X is stronger on dry and efficiency. Gislaved Nord Frost 200 is stronger on wet and noise. Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Gislaved Nord Frost 200 scores 71 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X scores 72 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X scores 75 vs 70 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Gislaved Nord Frost 200 scores 71 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X
Tire B · Gislaved Nord Frost 200

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter i cept IZ3 X or Nord Frost 200?

Which is better in the wet, Winter i cept IZ3 X or Nord Frost 200?

Gislaved Nord Frost 200, 71 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter i cept IZ3 X or Nord Frost 200?

Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X, 72 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Winter i cept IZ3 X or Nord Frost 200?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Winter i cept IZ3 X or Nord Frost 200?

Gislaved Nord Frost 200, 71 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which rolls more easily, Winter i cept IZ3 X or Nord Frost 200?

Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X, 75 vs 70 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology