Kumho 758 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Toyo 330 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho 758 vs Toyo 330 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

758 leads, 62–59 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho 758
Tire AKumho

758

Summer Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 4 reviews

Toyo 330
Tire BToyo

330

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    330 +3
    61
    Why this score
    Source758330
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5257

    758: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 58

    330: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61

    No road tests of dry for 758. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for 330. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    758 +12
    52
    Why this score
    Source758330
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online6245

    758: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    330: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 45.2 = 52

    No road tests of wet for 758. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for 330. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 62

    Comfort

    330 +3
    65
    Why this score
    Source758330
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5561

    758: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 62

    330: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for 758 or 330. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 69

    Treadwear

    758 +5
    64
    Why this score
    Source758330
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7163

    758: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69

    330: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for 758. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for 330. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 58

    Handling (owners)

    758 +1
    57
    Why this score
    Source758330
    Reviews found online5857
Scores at a glance
Kumho 758 vs Toyo 330: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho 758Toyo 330
Relative Score 62 59
Dry 58 61
Wet 64 52
Comfort 62 65
Treadwear 69 64
Handling (owners) 58 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

758

330

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A 758

Pros

  • Strong handling and braking performance on both wet and dry surfaces
  • Excellent water drainage
  • Exceptional tread longevity

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise
  • Subpar ride comfort
  • Inconsistent user experience regarding refinement
All owner themes in the 758 review

Tire B 330

Pros

  • Good dry weather grip and feedback
  • Quiet operation and comfortable ride quality
  • Reasonable price point for budget-conscious buyers

Cons

  • Extremely poor wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Unpredictable handling in rain leading to loss of vehicle control
  • Inconsistent safety reputation compared to modern tire standards
All owner themes in the 330 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho 758 B · Toyo 330
CategorySummer Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho 758

Toyo 330

Narrow edge: Kumho 758 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Toyo 330 if dry and comfort matter most to you. Kumho 758 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo 330 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho 758 scores 64 vs 52 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho 758 scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo 330 scores 61 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo 330 scores 65 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho 758
Tire B · Toyo 330

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

758 or 330?

Which is better in the wet, 758 or 330?

Kumho 758, 64 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, 758 or 330?

Toyo 330, 61 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, 758 or 330?

Toyo 330, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, 758 or 330?

Kumho 758, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology