Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 4 reviews
Kumho 758 vs Yokohama BluEarth AE50 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: 758 and BluEarth AE50 are level at 62.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 54 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
BluEarth AE50 +764Why this score
Source 758 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 52 53 -
64
Wet
BluEarth AE50 +367Why this score
Source 758 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 62 60 -
62
Comfort
BluEarth AE50 +466Why this score
Source 758 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 55 56 -
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source 758 BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 -
69
Treadwear
758 +1455Why this score
Source 758 BluEarth AE50 Reviews found online 71 48 -
58
Handling
758 +157Why this score
Source 758 BluEarth AE50 Reviews found online 58 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho 758 | Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 62 |
| Dry | 57 | 64 |
| Wet | 64 | 67 |
| Comfort | 62 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 55 |
| Handling | 58 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
758
BluEarth AE50
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A 758
Pros
- Strong handling and braking performance on both wet and dry surfaces
- Excellent water drainage
- Exceptional tread longevity
Cons
- Noticeable road noise
- Subpar ride comfort
- Inconsistent user experience regarding refinement
Tire B BluEarth AE50
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho 758 | B · Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 28 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho 758
Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Too close to call: Kumho 758 and Yokohama BluEarth AE50 are within 2 points overall. Kumho 758 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth AE50 is stronger on dry, comfort and wet.
Kumho 758 scores 69 vs 55 on treadwear.
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 scores 64 vs 57 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 scores 67 vs 64 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.