Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9,931 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
N2000 is ahead, 68–63
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 14 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 67 |
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
N2000: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 70 |
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
N2000: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 65 |
Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63
N2000: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 70 |
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
N2000: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 55 | 63 |
| Category | Kumho Ecowing ES31 | Nexen N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 68 |
| Dry | 64 | 67 |
| Wet | 63 | 70 |
| Comfort | 63 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecowing ES31
N2000
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
“Kumho ecowing es31 é o melhor custo benefício, tem classificação B de consumo e C de aderência, eu já tive pneu da Kumho e gostei da aderência e é um pneu macio pra conforto. Continental Power Contact 2 tbm é uma boa opção. Eu não recomendo xbri, farroad, ling long, speedmax, pois tem durabilidade baixa.”
“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
Based on 12 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecowing ES31 | B · Nexen N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | — |
| UTQG | — | 340 - 440 A - AA A |
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Nexen N2000
Winner: Nexen N2000 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N2000 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N2000 scores 63 vs 55 on handling.
Nexen N2000 scores 70 vs 63 on wet.
Nexen N2000 scores 67 vs 64 on dry.
Nexen N2000 scores 66 vs 63 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Nexen N2000, 70 vs 63 on our wet score.
Nexen N2000, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.
Nexen N2000, 66 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Nexen N2000, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
