Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 3 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho ecowing KH30 vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: ecowing KH30 and S FIT AS are level at 64.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Level64Why this score
Source ecowing KH30 S FIT AS Reviews found online 62 62 -
68
Wet
ecowing KH30 +662Why this score
Source ecowing KH30 S FIT AS Reviews found online 67 59 -
–
Snow
No comparison52Why this score
Source ecowing KH30 S FIT AS Reviews found online – 41 -
64
Comfort
S FIT AS +266Why this score
Source ecowing KH30 S FIT AS Reviews found online 58 63 -
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source ecowing KH30 S FIT AS Reviews found online – 61 -
61
Treadwear
S FIT AS +869Why this score
Source ecowing KH30 S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 57 61 -
61
Handling
Level61Why this score
Source ecowing KH30 S FIT AS Reviews found online 61 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho ecowing KH30 | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 64 |
| Dry | 64 | 64 |
| Wet | 68 | 62 |
| Snow | – | 52 |
| Comfort | 64 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 69 |
| Handling | 61 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
ecowing KH30
64
/ 100
S FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ecowing KH30
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Improved ride comfort and smoothness
- Reduced rolling resistance leading to easier acceleration
Cons
- Limited long-term data available in provided reviews
- Performance characteristics may vary significantly compared to premium European brands
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho ecowing KH30 | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Kumho ecowing KH30
64
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
Too close to call: Kumho ecowing KH30 and Laufenn S FIT AS are within 2 points overall. Kumho ecowing KH30 is stronger on wet. Laufenn S FIT AS is stronger on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 69 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho ecowing KH30 scores 68 vs 62 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho ecowing KH30
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.