tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 78 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 leads, 61–58 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire BKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 78 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 +6
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LX Platinum KU27Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6051

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63

    Solus TA31: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta LX Platinum KU27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 62

    Wet

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 +2
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LX Platinum KU27Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5856

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 62

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta LX Platinum KU27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 56

    Snow

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 +2
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LX Platinum KU27Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4743

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 56

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta LX Platinum KU27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 +1
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LX Platinum KU27Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5855

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61

    Solus TA31: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 55.2 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Solus TA31 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LX Platinum KU27Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5560

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 62

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Solus TA31 +1
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LX Platinum KU27Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4951

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta LX Platinum KU27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 +13
    50
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LX Platinum KU27Solus TA31
    Reviews found online6350
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27Kumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 61 58
Dry 63 57
Wet 62 60
Snow 56 54
Comfort 61 60
Noise 62 64
Treadwear 56 57
Handling (owners) 63 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecsta LX Platinum KU27

± 7

Solus TA31

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta LX Platinum KU27

Pros

  • Good handling in dry and wet conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Attractive appearance

Cons

  • Tread life and long-term durability are unproven and remain to be determined
  • Not recommended for severe winter use
All owner themes in the Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 review

Tire B Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategoryPremium Touring All-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—22
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″9.5/32″
UTQG600 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27

Kumho Solus TA31

Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 — better handling and dry. Where the Kumho Solus TA31 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 scores 63 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 scores 63 vs 57 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 60 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31?

Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum KU27, 63 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 54 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta LX Platinum KU27 or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 57 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology