Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Hankook Optimo H428 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta PA51 is ahead, 68–39
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 25 · 3 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Ecsta PA51 +3038Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Optimo H428 Reviews found online 68 21 -
68
Wet
Ecsta PA51 +3236Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Optimo H428 Reviews found online 67 24 -
62
Snow
Ecsta PA51 +2240Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Optimo H428 Reviews found online 57 20 -
66
Comfort
Ecsta PA51 +2145Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Optimo H428 Reviews found online 63 21 -
69
Noise
Ecsta PA51 +1752Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Optimo H428 Reviews found online 72 30 -
71
Treadwear
Ecsta PA51 +2348Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Optimo H428 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 72 36 -
66
Handling
Ecsta PA51 +4323Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Optimo H428 Reviews found online 66 23
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PA51 | Hankook Optimo H428 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 39 |
| Dry | 68 | 38 |
| Wet | 68 | 36 |
| Snow | 62 | 40 |
| Comfort | 66 | 45 |
| Noise | 69 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 48 |
| Handling | 66 | 23 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecsta PA51
Optimo H428
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PA51
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Tire B Optimo H428
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 | B · Hankook Optimo H428 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 13 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10.5/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta PA51
Hankook Optimo H428
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 66 vs 23 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 68 vs 36 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 68 vs 38 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 48 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.