Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Ecsta PA51 leads, 68–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Ecsta PA51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews

Best test result: #7 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (overall ranking)

Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo

Summer

Tests 74 · 1 test Owners 64 · 45 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 11 in 2010 Auto Express Ultra High Performance Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51Ventus S1 evo
    Professional tests (TWG score)–75
    Reviews found online6864
  2. 68

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51Ventus S1 evo
    Professional tests (TWG score)–74
    Reviews found online6766
  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51Ventus S1 evo
    Reviews found online57–
  4. 66

    Comfort

    Ecsta PA51 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51Ventus S1 evo
    Reviews found online6362
  5. 69

    Noise

    Ecsta PA51 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51Ventus S1 evo
    Professional tests (TWG score)–67
    Reviews found online72–
  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PA51 +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51Ventus S1 evo
    Professional tests (TWG score)70–
    Reviews found online7263
  7. 66

    Handling

    Ecsta PA51 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51Ventus S1 evo
    Reviews found online6664
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PA51Hankook Ventus S1 evo
Relative Score 68 67
Dry 68 70
Wet 68 71
Snow 62 –
Comfort 66 65
Noise 69 67
Treadwear 71 64
Handling 66 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta PA51

Ventus S1 evo

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta PA51Ventus S1 evoΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 67% #7/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires 20% #5/11 · 2010 Auto Express Ultra High Performance Tyre Test +46.7 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PA51

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
  • Some reports of increased road noise over time
  • Limited availability in certain niche sizes
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA51 review

Tire B Ventus S1 evo

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and sporty, predictable handling
  • High value for money compared to more expensive premium brands
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Subpar or inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users
  • Rapid tread wear on specific vehicles or under aggressive driving
  • Tendency for the rubber to crack or perish prematurely along the grooves over time
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1329
Rim diameters16″ – 19″15″ – 22″
Tread depth10.5/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PA51

Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Too close to call: Kumho Ecsta PA51 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta PA51 is stronger on treadwear. Hankook Ventus S1 evo is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 71 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

68

Narrow edge

Ecsta PA51

Amazon