Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Nexen CP671 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta PA51 leads, 68–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Ecsta PA51 +167Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 CP671 Reviews found online 68 66 -
68
Wet
Level68Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 CP671 Reviews found online 67 67 -
62
Snow
Ecsta PA51 +260Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 CP671 Reviews found online 57 54 -
66
Comfort
CP671 +167Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 CP671 Reviews found online 63 65 -
69
Noise
Ecsta PA51 +366Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 CP671 Reviews found online 72 64 -
71
Treadwear
Ecsta PA51 +764Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 CP671 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 72 63 -
66
Handling
CP671 +167Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 CP671 Reviews found online 66 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PA51 | Nexen CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 66 |
| Dry | 68 | 67 |
| Wet | 68 | 68 |
| Snow | 62 | 60 |
| Comfort | 66 | 67 |
| Noise | 69 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 64 |
| Handling | 66 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecsta PA51
CP671
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PA51
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Tire B CP671
Pros
- Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
- Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
- Impressive tread life and durability with regular rotations
Cons
- Subpar or limited performance in heavy snow and winter weather
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or minor roaring, especially at lower speeds
- Directional tread design can complicate tire rotation procedures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 | B · Nexen CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 13 | 12 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 10.5/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 400 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 36 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta PA51
Nexen CP671
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better treadwear and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 64 on treadwear.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 69 vs 66 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.