Pirelli P6000 Powergy looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Pirelli P6000 Powergy — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 165 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PA51 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PA51
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PA51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 70 · 165 reviews

Pirelli P6000 Powergy
Tire BPirelli

P6000 Powergy

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Ecsta PA51 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51P6000 Powergy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7065

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69

    P6000 Powergy: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for P6000 Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Ecsta PA51 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51P6000 Powergy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7163

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    P6000 Powergy: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for P6000 Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51P6000 Powergy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online59–

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Ecsta PA51 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51P6000 Powergy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6559

    Ecsta PA51: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.7 = 66

    P6000 Powergy: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.8 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for P6000 Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51P6000 Powergy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PA51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PA51 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51P6000 Powergy
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7470

    Ecsta PA51: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 74.4 = 72

    P6000 Powergy: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for P6000 Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PA51 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA51P6000 Powergy
    Reviews found online6764
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Pirelli P6000 Powergy: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PA51Pirelli P6000 Powergy
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 69 66
Wet 71 65
Snow 64 –
Comfort 66 62
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 72 69
Handling (owners) 67 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecsta PA51

± 8

P6000 Powergy

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PA51

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
  • Some reports of increased road noise over time
  • Limited availability in certain niche sizes
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA51 review

Tire B P6000 Powergy

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity
  • Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
  • Low fuel efficiency ratings compared to competitors
  • Increased road noise reported by some users
All owner themes in the P6000 Powergy review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 B · Pirelli P6000 Powergy
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13—
Rim diameters16″ – 19″—
Tread depth10.5/32″—
UTQG500 A A180 A A
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PA51

Pirelli P6000 Powergy

Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Pirelli P6000 Powergy rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 69 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 72 vs 69 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Tire B · Pirelli P6000 Powergy

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PA51 or P6000 Powergy?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PA51 or P6000 Powergy?

Kumho Ecsta PA51, 71 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PA51 or P6000 Powergy?

Kumho Ecsta PA51, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PA51 or P6000 Powergy?

Kumho Ecsta PA51, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PA51 or P6000 Powergy?

Kumho Ecsta PA51, 72 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology