Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 187 reviews
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Kumho Ecsta V730 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 187 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 70–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Advan Neova AD08 +275Why this score
Source Ecsta V730 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 76 80 Ecsta V730: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
38
Wet
Advan Neova AD08 +3169Why this score
Source Ecsta V730 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 45 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 26 69 Ecsta V730: 60% × 45.3 (est.) + 40% × 26 = 38
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
49
Snow
Advan Neova AD08 +1665Why this score
Source Ecsta V730 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 35 61 Ecsta V730: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 49
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
62
Comfort
Advan Neova AD08 +668Why this score
Source Ecsta V730 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 55 67 Ecsta V730: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
Advan Neova AD08 +167Why this score
Source Ecsta V730 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 68 Ecsta V730: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Advan Neova AD08 +163Why this score
Source Ecsta V730 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 60 61 Ecsta V730: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 62
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Advan Neova AD08 +1179Why this score
Source Ecsta V730 Advan Neova AD08 Reviews found online 68 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta V730 | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 70 |
| Dry | 73 | 75 |
| Wet | 38 | 69 |
| Snow | 49 | 65 |
| Comfort | 62 | 68 |
| Noise | 66 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecsta V730
Advan Neova AD08
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta V730
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and predictable handling characteristics at the limit.
- High heat tolerance with minimal 'greasy' drop-off during long track sessions.
- Superior tread life and durability compared to many direct 200TW competitors.
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance, particularly with standing water or worn tread.
- Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperature, making them poor for cold-weather street use.
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise due to the stiff sidewall construction.
Tire B Advan Neova AD08
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
- Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
- Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction
Cons
- Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
- Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
- Limited size availability for larger rims
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta V730 | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 8.5/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta V730
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better wet, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 69 vs 38 on wet.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 65 vs 49 on snow.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 68 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 68 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08?
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 69 vs 38 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08?
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 65 vs 49 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08?
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta V730 or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology