Kumho Road Venture 798 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Road Venture 798 vs Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Road Venture 798
Tire AKumho

Road Venture 798

All Season Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceRoad Venture 798Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online–79

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceRoad Venture 798Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online–79

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 75.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceRoad Venture 798Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–37

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 36.9 = 50

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceRoad Venture 798Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online–74

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.2 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceRoad Venture 798Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceRoad Venture 798Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceRoad Venture 798Geolandar X-CV G057
    Reviews found online–77
Scores at a glance
Kumho Road Venture 798 vs Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Road Venture 798Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Relative Score – 70
Dry – 75
Wet – 77
Snow – 50
Comfort – 73
Noise – 69
Treadwear – 65
Handling (owners) – 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Road Venture 798

Geolandar X-CV G057

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Road Venture 798

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and mileage, with multiple users reporting between 30,000 to over 54,000 miles
  • Strong dry traction and commendable performance in snow
  • Low road noise levels when relatively fresh

Cons

  • Uneven tread wear reported by some users over time
  • Signs of cracking around the tread blocks as the tires age
  • Noticeable degradation in wet grip and increased noise as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the Road Venture 798 review

Tire B Geolandar X-CV G057

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and road confidence in rainy conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Crisp handling and responsive steering performance

Cons

  • Some users report faster-than-expected tread wear
  • Firm ride quality noted on certain crossover fitments
All owner themes in the Geolandar X-CV G057 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Road Venture 798 B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresAll-Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—520 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Road Venture 798

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

Only Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Kumho Road Venture 798
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology