Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus KH17 vs Nitto NT01 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 56 + 26 owner reviews. How we score

Solus KH17 is ahead, 60–44

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus KH17
Tire AKumho

Solus KH17

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 56 reviews

Nitto NT01
Tire BNitto

NT01

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 29 · 26 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    NT01 +2
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17NT01
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5457

    Solus KH17: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.8 = 59

    NT01: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Solus KH17 +37
    26
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17NT01
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 37 (est.)
    Reviews found online6110

    Solus KH17: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    NT01: 60% × 37.2 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 26

    No road tests of wet for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    33
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17NT01
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 48 (est.)
    Reviews found online–10

    NT01: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33

    No road tests of snow for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Solus KH17 +23
    37
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17NT01
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5522

    Solus KH17: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.9 = 60

    NT01: 40% × 60.5 (est.) + 60% × 22.1 = 37

    No road tests of comfort for Solus KH17 or NT01. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    46
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17NT01
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–14

    NT01: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 46

    No road tests of noise for NT01. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Solus KH17 +12
    45
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17NT01
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online5131

    Solus KH17: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57

    NT01: 60% × 53.9 (est.) + 40% × 31.1 = 45

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for NT01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Solus KH17 +9
    47
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17NT01
    Reviews found online5647
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus KH17 vs Nitto NT01: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus KH17Nitto NT01
Relative Score 60 44
Dry 59 61
Wet 63 26
Snow – 33
Comfort 60 37
Noise – 46
Treadwear 57 45
Handling (owners) 56 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Solus KH17

± 8

NT01

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus KH17

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong dry weather traction and road feedback
  • Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
  • Mixed performance in wet conditions
  • Susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural issues
All owner themes in the Solus KH17 review

Tire B NT01

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and traction once warmed up
  • Outstanding tread life and durability for a track tire (wears like iron)
  • Consistent performance across multiple heat cycles with minimal degradation

Cons

  • High risk of hydroplaning and poor performance in heavy rain or standing water
  • Loud road noise and harsh ride quality when used for street driving
  • Slow to warm up properly on the street, leading to faster wear off-track
All owner themes in the NT01 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus KH17 B · Nitto NT01
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1117
Rim diameters13″ – 18″14″ – 19″
Tread depth—6.3/32″
UTQG—100 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus KH17

Nitto NT01

Winner: Kumho Solus KH17 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Where the Nitto NT01 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus KH17 scores 63 vs 26 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus KH17 scores 60 vs 37 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Solus KH17 scores 57 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus KH17 scores 56 vs 47 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Solus KH17
Tire B · Nitto NT01

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus KH17 or NT01?

Which is better in the wet, Solus KH17 or NT01?

Kumho Solus KH17, 63 vs 26 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KH17 or NT01?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 61 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus KH17 or NT01?

Kumho Solus KH17, 60 vs 37 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus KH17 or NT01?

Kumho Solus KH17, 57 vs 45 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology