Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 56 reviews
Kumho Solus KH17 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +969Why this score
Source Solus KH17 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 55 70 -
64
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +872Why this score
Source Solus KH17 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 63 73 -
63
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +972Why this score
Source Solus KH17 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 58 74 -
60
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +565Why this score
Source Solus KH17 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 55 65 -
58
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +1573Why this score
Source Solus KH17 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 58 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH17 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 70 |
| Dry | 60 | 69 |
| Wet | 64 | 72 |
| Comfort | 63 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 65 |
| Handling | 58 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Solus KH17
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus KH17
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong dry weather traction and road feedback
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
- Mixed performance in wet conditions
- Susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural issues
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH17 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Solus KH17
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 58 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 60 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 63 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 64 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.