BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA31 vs BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 78 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire AKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 78 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Advantage T/A Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    Solus TA31: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 60

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Advantage T/A Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 54

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Advantage T/A Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)–
    Reviews found online43–

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Advantage T/A Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    Solus TA31: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 55.1 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Advantage T/A Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online60–

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Advantage T/A Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 50

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Advantage T/A Sport
    Reviews found online50–
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus TA31 vs BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus TA31BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
Relative Score 58 –
Dry 57 –
Wet 60 –
Snow 54 –
Comfort 60 –
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 57 –
Handling (owners) 50 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus TA31

Advantage T/A Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Tire B Advantage T/A Sport

Pros

  • Strong cornering grip and stability
  • Responsive steering feedback
  • Comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise
  • Vague on-center steering feel
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A Sport review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA31 B · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
CategoryAll SeasonPremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available22—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth9.5/32″10/32″
UTQG500 A A600 - 660 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA31

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport

Only Kumho Solus TA31 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA31
Tire B · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology