Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Sunny NC501 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 2 road tests and 9 + 0 owner reviews. How we score

G Fit 4S is ahead, 73–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire ALaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

± 6

Tests 69 · 5 tests Owners 81 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Sunny NC501
Tire BSunny

NC501

All Season

± 8

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test (snow traction)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    NC501 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SNC501
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests6072
    Reviews found online82≈ 70 (est.)

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 60.3 + 40% × 81.6 = 69

    NC501: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 69.9 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of dry for NC501. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 84

    Wet

    G Fit 4S +35
    49
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SNC501
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests8444
    Reviews found online85≈ 56 (est.)

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 84 + 40% × 85.1 = 84

    NC501: 60% × 44 + 40% × 56 (est.) = 49

    No owner ratings of wet for NC501. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Snow

    G Fit 4S +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SNC501
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7167
    Reviews found online77≈ 69 (est.)

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 77.4 = 74

    NC501: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 69.4 (est.) = 68

    No owner ratings of snow for NC501. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SNC501
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online79–

    G Fit 4S: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 78.6 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for G Fit 4S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 49

    Noise

    NC501 +20
    69
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SNC501
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests3771
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 36.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 49

    NC501: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S or NC501. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SNC501
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72–
    Reviews found online78–

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 78.3 = 75

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SNC501
    Reviews found online80–
  8. 53

    Efficiency

    NC501 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SNC501
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests5362
Scores at a glance
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Sunny NC501: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn G Fit 4SSunny NC501
Relative Score 73 63
Dry 69 71
Wet 84 49
Snow 74 68
Comfort 76 –
Noise 49 69
Treadwear 75 –
Handling (owners) 80 –
Efficiency 53 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

G Fit 4S

± 8

NC501

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryG Fit 4SNC501ΔHead-to-head
Dry Handling Dry 100% #4/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test 100% #4/6 · 2025 Mid Range All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 94% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test 80% #7/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #2/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test 94% #6/6 · 2025 Mid Range All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 95% #11/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test 95% #6/6 · 2025 Mid Range All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 91% #9/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test 93% #3/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 94% #15/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test 98% #4/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 81% #14/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test 82% #4/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/9 2025 Motorlab All-Season Tire Test R16 #6/6 2026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

Tire B NC501

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn G Fit 4S B · Sunny NC501
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7994
Rim diameters13″ – 20″13″ – 20″
Sizes in common7676

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Sunny NC501

Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better wet and snow. Pick the Sunny NC501 if noise and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 84 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Sunny NC501 scores 69 vs 49 on noise.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Sunny NC501 scores 62 vs 53 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 74 vs 68 on snow.

Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Sunny NC501

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G Fit 4S or NC501?

Which is better in the wet, G Fit 4S or NC501?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 84 vs 49 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, G Fit 4S or NC501?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, G Fit 4S or NC501?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 74 vs 68 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, G Fit 4S or NC501?

Sunny NC501, 69 vs 49 on our noise score.

Which rolls more easily, G Fit 4S or NC501?

Sunny NC501, 62 vs 53 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology