Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Toyo Snowprox S943 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 9 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

G Fit 4S is ahead, 78–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire ALaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Toyo Snowprox S943
Tire BToyo

Snowprox S943

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    G Fit 4S +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests65≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8158

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 72

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 85

    Wet

    G Fit 4S +18
    67
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests86≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8565

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 77

    Snow

    G Fit 4S +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests77≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7755

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 77 = 77

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 62

    No road tests of snow for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    G Fit 4S +15
    60
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7857

    G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 78.1 = 75

    Snowprox S943: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.5 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 38

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests18–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 38

    No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    G Fit 4S +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7965

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    G Fit 4S +24
    56
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SSnowprox S943
    Reviews found online8056
  8. 47

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests47–
Scores at a glance
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Toyo Snowprox S943: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn G Fit 4SToyo Snowprox S943
Relative Score 78 63
Dry 72 61
Wet 85 67
Snow 77 62
Comfort 75 60
Noise 38 –
Treadwear 75 65
Handling (owners) 80 56
Efficiency 47 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

G Fit 4S

± 8

Snowprox S943

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryG Fit 4SSnowprox S943ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/12 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test #15/16 2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

Tire B Snowprox S943

Pros

  • Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Reliable handling in cold, dry, and wet road conditions
  • Good tread longevity for some driving styles

Cons

  • Poor traction and grip in snow and icy conditions
  • Increased noise levels, particularly when cornering
  • Inconsistent performance in wet conditions, specifically regarding hydroplaning
All owner themes in the Snowprox S943 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn G Fit 4S B · Toyo Snowprox S943
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7935
Rim diameters13″ – 20″14″ – 17″
UTQG640 B A—
Sizes in common2121

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Toyo Snowprox S943

Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better handling, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Snowprox S943 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 80 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 85 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 77 vs 62 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 75 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Toyo Snowprox S943

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G Fit 4S or Snowprox S943?

Which is better in the wet, G Fit 4S or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, G Fit 4S or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 72 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, G Fit 4S or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 77 vs 62 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, G Fit 4S or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, G Fit 4S or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology