Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn I Fit+ vs Nexen N Priz 4S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 7 + 0 road tests and 4 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

I Fit+ is ahead, 76–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn I Fit+
Tire ALaufenn

I Fit+

Winter

± 6

Tests 73 · 7 tests Owners 79 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (snow handling)

Nexen N Priz 4S
Tire BNexen

N Priz 4S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    I Fit+ +15
    59
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+N Priz 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests71≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7954

    I Fit+: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 78.9 = 74

    N Priz 4S: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of dry for N Priz 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 79

    Wet

    I Fit+ +22
    57
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+N Priz 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests76≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8452

    I Fit+: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 84.1 = 79

    N Priz 4S: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    No road tests of wet for N Priz 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 80

    Snow

    I Fit+ +20
    60
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+N Priz 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests79≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8154

    I Fit+: 60% × 78.9 + 40% × 80.9 = 80

    N Priz 4S: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60

    No road tests of snow for N Priz 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    I Fit+ +15
    60
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+N Priz 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7856

    I Fit+: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75

    N Priz 4S: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 55.8 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for I Fit+ or N Priz 4S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+N Priz 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests76–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    I Fit+: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for I Fit+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    I Fit+ +13
    55
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+N Priz 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests64≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7348

    I Fit+: 60% × 64 + 40% × 73.4 = 68

    N Priz 4S: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for N Priz 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    I Fit+ +28
    52
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+N Priz 4S
    Reviews found online8052
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+N Priz 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests73–
Scores at a glance
Laufenn I Fit+ vs Nexen N Priz 4S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn I Fit+Nexen N Priz 4S
Relative Score 76 58
Dry 74 59
Wet 79 57
Snow 80 60
Comfort 75 60
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 68 55
Handling (owners) 80 52
Efficiency 73 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

I Fit+

± 8

N Priz 4S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryI Fit+N Priz 4SΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #38/55 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test #9/10 2015 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A I Fit+

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and performance on deep snow and ice
  • Unbeatable price-to-quality ratio and overall value
  • Reliable and safe handling on dry and wet road surfaces

Cons

  • Slightly weaker performance in heavy slush
  • Difficulty in water evacuation on roads with standing water
All owner themes in the I Fit+ review

Tire B N Priz 4S

Pros

  • Good dry grip and handling performance
  • Commendable traction and control in snow and cold temperatures
  • Comfortable and quiet ride quality with low noise

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet-weather grip leading to understeer and difficult braking
  • Rapid or poor tread wear reported by multiple users
  • Inconsistent performance on ice and slush
All owner themes in the N Priz 4S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn I Fit+ B · Nexen N Priz 4S
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6129
Rim diameters13″ – 19″13″ – 17″
Sizes in common2525

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn I Fit+

Nexen N Priz 4S

Winner: Laufenn I Fit+ — better handling, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Priz 4S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 80 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 79 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 80 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 74 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Laufenn I Fit+
Tire B · Nexen N Priz 4S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

I Fit+ or N Priz 4S?

Which is better in the wet, I Fit+ or N Priz 4S?

Laufenn I Fit+, 79 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, I Fit+ or N Priz 4S?

Laufenn I Fit+, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, I Fit+ or N Priz 4S?

Laufenn I Fit+, 80 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, I Fit+ or N Priz 4S?

Laufenn I Fit+, 75 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, I Fit+ or N Priz 4S?

Laufenn I Fit+, 68 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology