Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn I Fit+ vs Toyo Snowprox S943 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 7 + 0 road tests and 4 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

I Fit+ is ahead, 76–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn I Fit+
Tire ALaufenn

I Fit+

Winter

± 6

Tests 73 · 7 tests Owners 79 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (snow handling)

Toyo Snowprox S943
Tire BToyo

Snowprox S943

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    I Fit+ +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+Snowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests71≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7958

    I Fit+: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 78.9 = 74

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 79

    Wet

    I Fit+ +12
    67
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+Snowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests76≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8465

    I Fit+: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 84.1 = 79

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 80

    Snow

    I Fit+ +19
    61
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+Snowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests79≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8156

    I Fit+: 60% × 78.9 + 40% × 80.9 = 80

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    I Fit+ +14
    61
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+Snowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7857

    I Fit+: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75

    Snowprox S943: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 57 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for I Fit+ or Snowprox S943. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+Snowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests76–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    I Fit+: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for I Fit+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    I Fit+ +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+Snowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests64≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7365

    I Fit+: 60% × 64 + 40% × 73.4 = 68

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    I Fit+ +24
    56
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+Snowprox S943
    Reviews found online8056
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+Snowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests73–
Scores at a glance
Laufenn I Fit+ vs Toyo Snowprox S943: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn I Fit+Toyo Snowprox S943
Relative Score 76 63
Dry 74 62
Wet 79 67
Snow 80 61
Comfort 75 61
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 68 65
Handling (owners) 80 56
Efficiency 73 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

I Fit+

± 8

Snowprox S943

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryI Fit+Snowprox S943ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #38/55 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test #15/16 2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A I Fit+

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and performance on deep snow and ice
  • Unbeatable price-to-quality ratio and overall value
  • Reliable and safe handling on dry and wet road surfaces

Cons

  • Slightly weaker performance in heavy slush
  • Difficulty in water evacuation on roads with standing water
All owner themes in the I Fit+ review

Tire B Snowprox S943

Pros

  • Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Reliable handling in cold, dry, and wet road conditions
  • Good tread longevity for some driving styles

Cons

  • Poor traction and grip in snow and icy conditions
  • Increased noise levels, particularly when cornering
  • Inconsistent performance in wet conditions, specifically regarding hydroplaning
All owner themes in the Snowprox S943 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn I Fit+ B · Toyo Snowprox S943
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6135
Rim diameters13″ – 19″14″ – 17″
Sizes in common2222

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn I Fit+

Toyo Snowprox S943

Winner: Laufenn I Fit+ — better handling, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Snowprox S943 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 80 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 80 vs 61 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 75 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 74 vs 62 on dry.

Tire A · Laufenn I Fit+
Tire B · Toyo Snowprox S943

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

I Fit+ or Snowprox S943?

Which is better in the wet, I Fit+ or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn I Fit+, 79 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, I Fit+ or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn I Fit+, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, I Fit+ or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn I Fit+, 80 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, I Fit+ or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn I Fit+, 75 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, I Fit+ or Snowprox S943?

Laufenn I Fit+, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology