Tests 66 · 1 test Owners – · none yet
Laufenn I Fit Winter vs Sunfull SF W11 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 0 + 0 owner reviews. How we score
I Fit Winter is ahead, 67–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison65Why this score
Source I Fit Winter SF W11 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 64 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) SF W11: 60% × 64.5 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of dry for SF W11. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
I Fit Winter +661Why this score
Source I Fit Winter SF W11 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 66 59 Reviews found online ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) I Fit Winter: 60% × 66.2 + 40% × 68.2 (est.) = 67
SF W11: 60% × 59.3 + 40% × 64.5 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of wet for I Fit Winter. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No owner ratings of wet for SF W11. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison71Why this score
Source I Fit Winter SF W11 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71 Reviews found online – ≈ 71 (est.) SF W11: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 70.7 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of snow for SF W11. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn I Fit Winter | Sunfull SF W11 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 61 |
| Dry | – | 65 |
| Wet | 67 | 61 |
| Snow | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
I Fit Winter
SF W11
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | I Fit Winter | SF W11 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | Wet | 84% #42/56 · 2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview | 75% #8/8 · 2024 Moottori Winter Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #41/56 2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview | #6/8 2024 Moottori Winter Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn I Fit Winter | B · Sunfull SF W11 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Laufenn I Fit Winter
Sunfull SF W11
Winner: Laufenn I Fit Winter — better wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn I Fit Winter rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 0 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Laufenn I Fit Winter scores 67 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
I Fit Winter or SF W11?
Which is better in the wet, I Fit Winter or SF W11?
Laufenn I Fit Winter, 67 vs 61 on our wet score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology