Tests 50 · 1 test Owners 44 · 7 reviews
Laufenn I FIT vs Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 7 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
X-Ice Snow SUV is ahead, 72–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 2 tests Owners 76 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
X-Ice Snow SUV +2272Why this score
Source I FIT X-Ice Snow SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 40 74 I FIT: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 50
X-Ice Snow SUV: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 73.7 = 72
No road tests of dry for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
43
Wet
X-Ice Snow SUV +2467Why this score
Source I FIT X-Ice Snow SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 50 57 Reviews found online 34 80 I FIT: 60% × 49.9 + 40% × 33.5 = 43
X-Ice Snow SUV: 60% × 57.5 + 40% × 80.3 = 67
-
63
Snow
X-Ice Snow SUV +1376Why this score
Source I FIT X-Ice Snow SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 58 81 I FIT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 63
X-Ice Snow SUV: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 80.8 = 76
No road tests of snow for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
55
Comfort
X-Ice Snow SUV +1974Why this score
Source I FIT X-Ice Snow SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 48 77 I FIT: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48 = 55
X-Ice Snow SUV: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for X-Ice Snow SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source I FIT X-Ice Snow SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) X-Ice Snow SUV: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of noise for X-Ice Snow SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
54
Treadwear
X-Ice Snow SUV +1670Why this score
Source I FIT X-Ice Snow SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 46 72 I FIT: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54
X-Ice Snow SUV: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for X-Ice Snow SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
37
Handling (owners)
X-Ice Snow SUV +3673Why this score
Source I FIT X-Ice Snow SUV Reviews found online 37 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source I FIT X-Ice Snow SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn I FIT | Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 72 |
| Dry | 50 | 72 |
| Wet | 43 | 67 |
| Snow | 63 | 76 |
| Comfort | 55 | 74 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 37 | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
I FIT
X-Ice Snow SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | I FIT | X-Ice Snow SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | Wet | 74% #44/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | 88% #5/8 · 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #47/45 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | #5/8 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A I FIT
Pros
- Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
- Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand
Cons
- Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
- Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
- Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
Tire B X-Ice Snow SUV
Pros
- Outstanding traction on snow and ice
- Remarkably low road noise for a winter tire
- Excellent ride comfort
Cons
- Unsuitable for year-round use due to soft compound in warm temperatures
- Reduced handling precision compared to dedicated summer tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn I FIT | B · Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | 90 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Laufenn I FIT
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV
Winner: Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn I FIT rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV scores 73 vs 37 on handling.
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV scores 67 vs 43 on wet.
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV scores 72 vs 50 on dry.
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV scores 74 vs 55 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
I FIT or X-Ice Snow SUV?
Which is better in the wet, I FIT or X-Ice Snow SUV?
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV, 67 vs 43 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, I FIT or X-Ice Snow SUV?
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV, 72 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, I FIT or X-Ice Snow SUV?
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV, 76 vs 63 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, I FIT or X-Ice Snow SUV?
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV, 74 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, I FIT or X-Ice Snow SUV?
Michelin X-Ice Snow SUV, 70 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology