Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs Michelin Energy MXV4+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 76–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AMichelin

Agilis CrossClimate

All Season

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 81 · 1,061 reviews

“Agilis CrossClimate all-weather cargo van tire So I had an electrician over to my house yesterday (in Michigan), and I saw his Ford Transit had the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate all-weather truck/van/cargo tire. I asked him how it was. He told me that the stock tires would get completely stuck even on plowed roads that had the tiniest bit of snow or ice left. But with the Agilis CrossClimate, he hadn't gotten stuck anymore. So I thought that was a cool story I would share. FYI, Toyo makes the Celsius Cargo, which is another all-weather tire for cargo vans and trucks. P.S. Some Agilis CrossClimate tires have a recall. Read more”

Tire BMichelin

Energy MXV4+

All Season Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Agilis CrossClimate +28
    49
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateEnergy MXV4+
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online8539
  2. 77

    Wet

    Agilis CrossClimate +22
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateEnergy MXV4+
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online8449
  3. 76

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateEnergy MXV4+
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online79–
  4. 74

    Comfort

    Agilis CrossClimate +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateEnergy MXV4+
    Reviews found online8066
  5. 74

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateEnergy MXV4+
    Professional tests (TWG score)73–
    Reviews found online76–
  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Agilis CrossClimate +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateEnergy MXV4+
    Reviews found online7767
  7. 80

    Handling

    Agilis CrossClimate +37
    43
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateEnergy MXV4+
    Reviews found online8043
Scores at a glance
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs Michelin Energy MXV4+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Agilis CrossClimateMichelin Energy MXV4+
Relative Score 76 55
Dry 77 49
Wet 77 55
Snow 76 –
Comfort 74 68
Noise 74 –
Treadwear 72 66
Handling 80 43

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Agilis CrossClimate

Energy MXV4+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Agilis CrossClimate

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling

Cons

  • Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
  • A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Agilis CrossClimate review

Tire B Energy MXV4+

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and cabin quietness
  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Strong value proposition as an OEM-style replacement

Cons

  • Poor steering response and handling precision
  • Degraded wet weather performance as the tread wears
  • Instability and vibration issues at higher highway speeds
All owner themes in the Energy MXV4+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Mixed

Community opinion on the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is generally positive regarding its winter and wet traction capabilities for heavy vans and trucks, though users note potential trade-offs in rolling resistance and tread wear. Mention of a recall regarding snow traction also introduces mixed perspectives, while commercial vehicle and RV owners frequently consider it as a top alternative.

r/Cartalk ·1 upvote ·2025-04-09

“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”

r/BoltEV ·5 upvotes ·2025-10-19

“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”

r/Finland ·2024-10-16

“Lapland - Tyre Advice - Michelin Agilis Crossclimate Grateful for the knowledge/experience of the good people of r/Finland . I ordinarily use studded tyres for my van, but planning a roadtrip down to Germany/France over the new year (so can't fit these). I've no experience with friction tyres on snow/ice, but have Michelin Agilis Crossclimate [ . These have the 3PMSF marking so I understand are technically legal in Finland for winter, but I'm not sure about safety/performance in Lapland (route being: Tornio, to Sweden and then down via Denmark.) Good to hear people's views, or if you've experience with these types of tyres in this environment? UPDATE: Really appreciate the comments and views put forward on this. By the debate it seems I’m not alone in being not clear about winter performance of a tyre rated 3PMSF but not a “true” Nordic friction tyre. It does not make economic sense to buy new winter friction tyres for a road trip. So thinking about packing the Michelins, driving the studded tyre and getting them swapped/stored in Denmark or South Sweden and then swapping back on return. A pain in ass, a waste of space but the least risky approach. If anyone’s done similar let me know your experience.”

Top themes
#Winter and snow traction#Commercial van and RV use#Rolling resistance and efficiency#Tread wear and longevity#Recall notices and compliance#Comparison with LTX models

Based on 9 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Energy MXV4+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate B · Michelin Energy MXV4+
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeVanPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available22—
Rim diameters15″ – 17″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Michelin Energy MXV4+

Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 80 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 49 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Tire B · Michelin Energy MXV4+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

76

Leads

Agilis CrossClimate

Amazon