Tests – · none yet Owners 84 · 8 reviews
Michelin City Grip 2 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 8 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
Different seasons: City Grip 2 and Pilot Alpin 4 are each scored against tires of their own season.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 3 tests Owners 89 · 28 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
City Grip 2 +377Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Pilot Alpin 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 87 92 City Grip 2: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 86.8 = 80
Pilot Alpin 4: 60% × 67.2 + 40% × 91.5 = 77
No road tests of dry for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
84
Wet
Level84Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Pilot Alpin 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 81 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 89 93 City Grip 2: 60% × 80.7 (est.) + 40% × 89.1 = 84
Pilot Alpin 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 93.2 = 84
No road tests of wet for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison76Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Pilot Alpin 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 72 Reviews found online – 83 Pilot Alpin 4: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 82.8 = 76
-
75
Comfort
Pilot Alpin 4 +782Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Pilot Alpin 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 79 88 City Grip 2: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 78.6 = 75
Pilot Alpin 4: 40% × 72.5 (est.) + 60% × 87.6 = 82
No road tests of comfort for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Alpin 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Pilot Alpin 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 57 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Pilot Alpin 4: 60% × 56.7 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Alpin 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
Pilot Alpin 4 +680Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Pilot Alpin 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 78 89 City Grip 2: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 74
Pilot Alpin 4: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 89 = 80
No road tests of treadwear for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Alpin 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
86
Handling (owners)
Pilot Alpin 4 +591Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Pilot Alpin 4 Reviews found online 86 91 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison66Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Pilot Alpin 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin City Grip 2 | Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 82 |
| Dry | 80 | 77 |
| Wet | 84 | 84 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 75 | 82 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 91 |
| Efficiency | – | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
City Grip 2
Pilot Alpin 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A City Grip 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Improved confidence and stability when cornering and leaning
- Solid mileage and tread longevity
Cons
- Slightly stiffer construction can reduce impact absorption or comfort on rough roads for certain riders
- Transmits noticeable road feedback and creases
- Requires a brief warm-up period of around 5 minutes to reach maximum stickiness
Tire B Pilot Alpin 4
Pros
- Exceptional grip and handling in snow and ice
- Sporty, responsive handling on dry and wet pavement
- High level of comfort and low road noise for a winter tire
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
- Above-average noise level reported by a few users due to the aggressive tread pattern
- Slight initial tread squirm when brand new before settling in
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin City Grip 2 | B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin City Grip 2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
Built for different seasons: Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 is a winter tire, Michelin City Grip 2 a summer tire. Each score is measured against tires of its own season, so the two are not ranked against each other — pick by the season you drive in.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology