Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Defender T+H vs General Grabber APT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 82 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Defender T+H 70, Grabber APT 69.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 82 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Defender T+H +267Why this score
Source Defender T+H Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 70 67 Defender T+H: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
Grabber APT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Grabber APT +274Why this score
Source Defender T+H Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 73 75 Defender T+H: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
Grabber APT: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
Grabber APT +267Why this score
Source Defender T+H Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 64 Defender T+H: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65
Grabber APT: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 67
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
Defender T+H +463Why this score
Source Defender T+H Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 66 60 Defender T+H: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67
Grabber APT: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H or Grabber APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source Defender T+H Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 53 Grabber APT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 61
No road tests of noise for Grabber APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Defender T+H +370Why this score
Source Defender T+H Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 76 71 Reviews found online 68 69 Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 68 = 73
Grabber APT: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 68.7 = 70
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison58Why this score
Source Defender T+H Grabber APT Reviews found online – 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Defender T+H | General Grabber APT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 69 |
| Dry | 69 | 67 |
| Wet | 72 | 74 |
| Snow | 65 | 67 |
| Comfort | 67 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Defender T+H
69
/ 100
Grabber APT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Defender T+H | Grabber APT | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 100% #1/8 · 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | 60% #5/18 · 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | #6/18 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Grabber APT
Pros
- Excellent traction in wet, snowy, and light off-road conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an all-terrain tire
- Attractive, rugged aesthetic that enhances vehicle appearance
Cons
- Difficulty in achieving proper wheel balance, leading to vibrations
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Tendency to pick up and retain gravel in tread grooves
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender T+H | B · General Grabber APT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 25 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 12 - 16/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 740 A - AA A - B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 90 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Michelin Defender T+H
69
/ 100
General Grabber APT
Too close to call: Michelin Defender T+H and General Grabber APT are within 2 points overall. Michelin Defender T+H is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Defender T+H scores 67 vs 63 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 70 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · General Grabber APT
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Defender T+H or Grabber APT?
Which is better in the wet, Defender T+H or Grabber APT?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Defender T+H or Grabber APT?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Defender T+H or Grabber APT?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Defender T+H or Grabber APT?
Michelin Defender T+H, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Defender T+H or Grabber APT?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology