Michelin Defender looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Defender vs Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Defender leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender
Tire AMichelin

Defender

Summer Premium Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 4 reviews

Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
Tire BNexen

Roadian H/TX RT5

All Season Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 3 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Defender +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDefenderRoadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7671

    Defender: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 73

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Level
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDefenderRoadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7474

    Defender: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDefenderRoadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDefenderRoadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7374

    Defender: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Defender or Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Treadwear

    Defender +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDefenderRoadian H/TX RT5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7262

    Defender: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 69

    Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Defender +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDefenderRoadian H/TX RT5
    Reviews found online7771
Scores at a glance
Michelin Defender vs Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin DefenderNexen Roadian H/TX RT5
Relative Score 72 70
Dry 73 70
Wet 73 73
Snow – 69
Comfort 71 71
Treadwear 69 64
Handling (owners) 77 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Defender

Roadian H/TX RT5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Defender

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Strong tread life and durability over several years
  • Reliable grip on dry pavement

Cons

  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain
  • Limited traction in deep or severe snow
  • Audible squealing during aggressive dry-pavement acceleration
All owner themes in the Defender review

Tire B Roadian H/TX RT5

Pros

  • Strong initial traction in varied weather conditions including snow, slush, and ice
  • Excellent performance for towing applications
  • Impressive off-road capability, particularly in soft sand

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in grip and handling characteristics after 8,000-10,000 miles
  • Increased susceptibility to oversteer and instability on wet surfaces as tread wears
  • Harsh ride quality and unpredictable handling at higher tire pressures
All owner themes in the Roadian H/TX RT5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender B · Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Defender

Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5

Narrow edge: Michelin Defender — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender scores 73 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Defender
Tire B · Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Defender or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Which is better in the wet, Defender or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Defender or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Michelin Defender, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Defender or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Defender or Roadian H/TX RT5?

Michelin Defender, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology