Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 69 · 137 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (wear)
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy Saver vs Goodyear EfficientGrip — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 137 + 1,727 owner reviews. How we score
Energy Saver is ahead, 69–59
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 1,727 reviews
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Energy Saver +1158Why this score
Source Energy Saver EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 71 ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 68 53 Energy Saver: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 67.6 = 69
EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58
No road tests of dry for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
Energy Saver +563Why this score
Source Energy Saver EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 69 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 60 Energy Saver: 60% × 69.1 + 40% × 66.6 = 68
EfficientGrip: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
No road tests of wet for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison67Why this score
Source Energy Saver EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 65 EfficientGrip: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67
No road tests of snow for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
Energy Saver +959Why this score
Source Energy Saver EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 68 54 Energy Saver: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.8 = 68
EfficientGrip: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 54 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver or EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
Energy Saver +1357Why this score
Source Energy Saver EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 72 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) 42 Energy Saver: 60% × 72.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70
EfficientGrip: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 57
No owner ratings of noise for Energy Saver. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
74
Treadwear
Energy Saver +1658Why this score
Source Energy Saver EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 74 ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 74 53 Energy Saver: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 74.2 = 74
EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.1 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Energy Saver +1747Why this score
Source Energy Saver EfficientGrip Reviews found online 64 47 -
75
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver EfficientGrip Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 75 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver | Goodyear EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 59 |
| Dry | 69 | 58 |
| Wet | 68 | 63 |
| Snow | – | 67 |
| Comfort | 68 | 59 |
| Noise | 70 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 47 |
| Efficiency | 75 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Energy Saver
59
/ 100
EfficientGrip
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Michelin Energy Saver finished ahead 1 times and Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 times.
| Discipline | Category | Energy Saver | EfficientGrip | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/14 | #12/14 | – | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 · 195/65 R15 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Low road noise and high levels of driving comfort
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip and traction, especially as the tires age
- Prone to dry rotting, cracking, and hardening after a few years
- Poor performance and sliding in cold or winter conditions
Tire B EfficientGrip
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Good fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Reliable wet and dry grip for everyday driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls result in a mushy or 'jelly-like' steering feel during cornering
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bulges, and punctures from road hazards
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin Energy Saver
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip family is mixed, with users frequently praising its high tread life, comfort, and solid wet braking compared to rivals. However, several drivers express concerns regarding soft sidewalls prone to pothole damage, vague handling dynamics during spirited driving, and disappointing cold or wet traction when used out of season. Many discussions also center on comparing it against alternative touring tires like Michelin Primacy and Continental PremiumContact.
r/TyreReviews
·3 upvotes ·2026-06-16
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
r/srbija_automobili
·9 upvotes ·2026-07-10
“Nov KUMHO ecsta sport ps 72 ili minimalno korišćen GOODYEAR efficientgrip 2? Pozdrav, molim za savet ko je imao iskustva sa ovim modelima guma. Trebaju mi letnje gume za Mazda 3 2.0 benzin 150 KS (na sport oprugama) i imam dve ponude: Nove Kumho ecsta sport ps 72 ili (pouzdano znam) 2000km korišćene Goodyear Efficientgrip performance 2 sa DOT 0726. Cena je bukvalno ista, godišnje prelazim oko 6k, volim da vozim dinamično kada može. Za Kumho sam čitao da je skoro predstavljena i da je solidna dok sam za Goodyear čitao da je za udobnu vožnju bez dinamike. Da li suštinski ta "sport" razlika može da se oseti u povremenoj dinamičnoj vožnji toliko pa da ima smisla odustati od povoljne odlične premium gume? Read more”
r/carsireland
·1 upvote ·2026-10-08
“Goodyear EfficientGrip - fitted in 2023 ~€520. Currently have 54k on them. Probably got another 2-3k before they’re down to the wear bars.”
Top themes
#tread life and longevity#soft sidewall damage#wet and winter grip#comfort vs sporty handling#summer touring tire comparisons#tread cracking and chipping
Based on 21 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver | B · Goodyear EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 16″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver
59
/ 100
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver — better handling, treadwear and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy Saver scores 64 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy Saver scores 74 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Energy Saver scores 70 vs 57 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Energy Saver scores 69 vs 58 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy Saver or EfficientGrip?
Which is better in the wet, Energy Saver or EfficientGrip?
Michelin Energy Saver, 68 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy Saver or EfficientGrip?
Michelin Energy Saver, 69 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Energy Saver or EfficientGrip?
Michelin Energy Saver, 70 vs 57 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy Saver or EfficientGrip?
Michelin Energy Saver, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy Saver or EfficientGrip?
Michelin Energy Saver, 74 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology