Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 55 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy XM2 vs Yokohama BluEarth AE01 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy XM2 is ahead, 67–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 22 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Energy XM2 +263Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE01 Reviews found online 64 60 -
68
Wet
Energy XM2 +266Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE01 Reviews found online 68 65 -
66
Comfort
Energy XM2 +165Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE01 Reviews found online 62 62 -
69
Treadwear
Energy XM2 +1356Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE01 Reviews found online 71 49 -
65
Handling
Energy XM2 +560Why this score
Source Energy XM2 BluEarth AE01 Reviews found online 65 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy XM2 | Yokohama BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 62 |
| Dry | 65 | 63 |
| Wet | 68 | 66 |
| Comfort | 66 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 56 |
| Handling | 65 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Energy XM2
62
/ 100
BluEarth AE01
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy XM2
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong puncture resistance
- Reliable dry and wet grip for daily driving
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can feel less responsive during spirited driving
- Premium price point compared to competitors
Tire B BluEarth AE01
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- High level of ride comfort and handling
Cons
- Inconsistent and often rapid tread wear
- Reports of increased road noise as the tire ages
- Longer braking distances on dry surfaces noted by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy XM2 | B · Yokohama BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 8 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 16″ | 13″ – 15″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Michelin Energy XM2
62
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth AE01
Winner: Michelin Energy XM2 — better treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 69 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 65 vs 60 on handling.
Tire A · Michelin Energy XM2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth AE01
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.