Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Primacy MXM4 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 10 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Primacy MXM4 leads, 64–62 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Primacy MXM4 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy MXM4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests87≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5773

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 86.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 75

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Primacy MXM4 +3
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy MXM4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests56≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6150

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.1 + 40% × 61.1 = 58

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 56

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy MXM4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)–
    Reviews found online47–

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Level
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy MXM4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests64≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5351

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 53.1 = 60

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy MXM4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests82–
    Reviews found online60–

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 59.6 = 73

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Primacy MXM4 +8
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy MXM4N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6147

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    N FERA SUR4 +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy MXM4N FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online5471
Scores at a glance
Michelin Primacy MXM4 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Primacy MXM4Nexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 64 62
Dry 75 71
Wet 58 55
Snow 56 –
Comfort 60 60
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 63 55
Handling (owners) 54 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Primacy MXM4

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Primacy MXM4

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
  • Strong tread life and durability
  • High fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
  • Noticeable understeer when cornering
  • Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
All owner themes in the Primacy MXM4 review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Primacy MXM4 B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Primacy MXM4

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Narrow edge: Michelin Primacy MXM4 — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4 if handling matters most to you. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 63 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 75 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 58 vs 55 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Primacy MXM4
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?

Michelin Primacy MXM4, 58 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?

Michelin Primacy MXM4, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?

Michelin Primacy MXM4, 63 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology