Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 57 · 10 reviews
Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Primacy MXM4 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 10 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy MXM4 leads, 64–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Primacy MXM4 +471Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 87 ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 57 73 Primacy MXM4: 60% × 86.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 75
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71
No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
58
Wet
Primacy MXM4 +355Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 56 ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 61 50 Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.1 + 40% × 61.1 = 58
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55
No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 47 – Primacy MXM4: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 56
No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
60
Comfort
Level60Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 64 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 53 51 Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 53.1 = 60
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
No road tests of comfort for N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 82 – Reviews found online 60 – Primacy MXM4: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 59.6 = 73
-
63
Treadwear
Primacy MXM4 +855Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 N FERA SUR4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 61 47 Primacy MXM4: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
54
Handling (owners)
N FERA SUR4 +1771Why this score
Source Primacy MXM4 N FERA SUR4 Reviews found online 54 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy MXM4 | Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 62 |
| Dry | 75 | 71 |
| Wet | 58 | 55 |
| Snow | 56 | – |
| Comfort | 60 | 60 |
| Noise | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 63 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 54 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Primacy MXM4
N FERA SUR4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Primacy MXM4
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
Tire B N FERA SUR4
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
- Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires
Cons
- High level of road noise
- Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Fast tread wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy MXM4 | B · Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Primacy MXM4
Nexen N FERA SUR4
Narrow edge: Michelin Primacy MXM4 — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4 if handling matters most to you. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 54 on handling.
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 63 vs 55 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 75 vs 71 on dry.
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 58 vs 55 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?
Which is better in the wet, Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 58 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Primacy MXM4 or N FERA SUR4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 63 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology