tirewheelguide

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin X-Ice Xi3 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

iceGUARD iG51v leads, 71–67 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · iceGUARD iG51v or X-Ice Xi3 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin X-Ice Xi3
Tire AMichelin

X-Ice Xi3

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 14 reviews

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Tire BYokohama

iceGUARD iG51v

Premium Touring Winter tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    iceGUARD iG51v +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice Xi3iceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6372

    X-Ice Xi3: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 71

    No road tests of dry for X-Ice Xi3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 67

    Wet

    iceGUARD iG51v +11
    78
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice Xi3iceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online6680

    X-Ice Xi3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 78

    No road tests of wet for X-Ice Xi3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    iceGUARD iG51v +5
    74
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice Xi3iceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6876

    X-Ice Xi3: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 69

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 74

    No road tests of snow for X-Ice Xi3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    iceGUARD iG51v +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice Xi3iceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6470

    X-Ice Xi3: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.4 = 66

    iceGUARD iG51v: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.7 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for X-Ice Xi3 or iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice Xi3iceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–58

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 63

    No road tests of noise for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    X-Ice Xi3 +11
    55
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice Xi3iceGUARD iG51v
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6549

    X-Ice Xi3: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for X-Ice Xi3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX-Ice Xi3iceGUARD iG51v
    Reviews found online57–
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin X-Ice Xi3Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Relative Score 67 71
Dry 65 71
Wet 67 78
Snow 69 74
Comfort 66 70
Noise – 63
Treadwear 66 55
Handling (owners) 57 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

X-Ice Xi3

± 8

iceGUARD iG51v

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A X-Ice Xi3

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Long-lasting treadwear and durability over multiple seasons
  • Good stability and grip on dry pavement and cold winter roads

Cons

  • Squirmy feel and delayed, sluggish steering response on dry and wet roads
  • Lacks cornering grip and confidence during sharp turns
  • Performs poorly in heavy mountain snow, wet ice, and milder above-freezing temperatures
All owner themes in the X-Ice Xi3 review

Tire B iceGUARD iG51v

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin X-Ice Xi3 B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
CategoryWinterPremium Touring Winter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available372
Rim diameters14″ – 20″18″
Tread depth—13/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin X-Ice Xi3

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

Narrow edge: Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v — better wet, dry and snow. Pick the Michelin X-Ice Xi3 if treadwear matters most to you. Michelin X-Ice Xi3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin X-Ice Xi3 scores 66 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 78 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 71 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 74 vs 69 on snow.

Tire A · Michelin X-Ice Xi3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

X-Ice Xi3 or iceGUARD iG51v?

Which is better in the wet, X-Ice Xi3 or iceGUARD iG51v?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 78 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, X-Ice Xi3 or iceGUARD iG51v?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 71 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, X-Ice Xi3 or iceGUARD iG51v?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 74 vs 69 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, X-Ice Xi3 or iceGUARD iG51v?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, X-Ice Xi3 or iceGUARD iG51v?

Michelin X-Ice Xi3, 66 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology