tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera RU5 vs Nitto Motivo — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 16 + 52 owner reviews. How we score

N'Fera RU5 is ahead, 71–56

Check price on Amazon · N'Fera RU5 or Motivo on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera RU5
Tire ANexen

N'Fera RU5

All-Season Ultra High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 16 reviews

Nitto Motivo
Tire BNitto

Motivo

All-Season Touring tires

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 50 · 52 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    N'Fera RU5 +19
    53
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Motivo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7544

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72

    Motivo: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.4 = 53

    No road tests of dry for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Motivo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    N'Fera RU5 +19
    55
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Motivo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7649

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74

    Motivo: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 55

    No road tests of wet for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Motivo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    N'Fera RU5 +6
    54
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Motivo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5243

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 60

    Motivo: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.5 = 54

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Motivo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU5 +20
    54
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Motivo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7647

    N'Fera RU5: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    Motivo: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.7 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Motivo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    N'Fera RU5 +9
    60
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Motivo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7449

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 69

    Motivo: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 60

    No road tests of noise for N'Fera RU5 or Motivo. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU5 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Motivo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)75
    Reviews found online7561

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    Motivo: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 61.2 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    N'Fera RU5 +23
    50
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Motivo
    Reviews found online7350
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N'Fera RU5Nitto Motivo
Relative Score 71 56
Dry 72 53
Wet 74 55
Snow 60 54
Comfort 74 54
Noise 69 60
Treadwear 72 69
Handling (owners) 73 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N'Fera RU5

± 7

Motivo

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera RU5

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
  • Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
  • Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads

Cons

  • Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
  • Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
  • Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU5 review

Tire B Motivo

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and exceptionally low road noise
  • Strong dry traction and responsive handling in corners
  • Great overall value and competitive pricing compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Subpar traction and grip in wet and snowy conditions for some drivers
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by a subset of users
  • Potential balancing issues or out-of-round manufacturing complaints
All owner themes in the Motivo review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera RU5 B · Nitto Motivo
CategoryAll-Season Ultra High Performance tiresAll-Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters16″ – 18″—
Tread depth10/32″10.3/32″
UTQG500 A A560 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera RU5

Nitto Motivo

Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N'Fera RU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 73 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 72 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 55 on wet.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nitto Motivo
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera RU5 or Motivo?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU5 or Motivo?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU5 or Motivo?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, N'Fera RU5 or Motivo?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 60 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, N'Fera RU5 or Motivo?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 69 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU5 or Motivo?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU5 or Motivo?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology