tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera RU5 vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

N'Fera RU5 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · N'Fera RU5 or Geolandar SUV on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera RU5
Tire ANexen

N'Fera RU5

All-Season Ultra High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 16 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    N'Fera RU5 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7568

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    N'Fera RU5 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7673

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 60

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU5 +11
    63
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7661

    N'Fera RU5: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    Geolandar SUV: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.6 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 69

    No road tests of noise for N'Fera RU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU5 +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7565

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    N'Fera RU5 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Geolandar SUV
    Reviews found online7370
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N'Fera RU5Yokohama Geolandar SUV
Relative Score 73 69
Dry 72 68
Wet 74 72
Snow 60 –
Comfort 74 63
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 72 66
Handling (owners) 73 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N'Fera RU5

± 8

Geolandar SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera RU5

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
  • Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
  • Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads

Cons

  • Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
  • Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
  • Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU5 review

Tire B Geolandar SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • High level of ride comfort
  • Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes

Cons

  • Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
  • Not suitable for high-performance driving
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
All owner themes in the Geolandar SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera RU5 B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
CategoryAll-Season Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters16″ – 18″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera RU5

Yokohama Geolandar SUV

Narrow edge: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N'Fera RU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar SUV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 72 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 72 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera RU5 or Geolandar SUV?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU5 or Geolandar SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU5 or Geolandar SUV?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU5 or Geolandar SUV?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU5 or Geolandar SUV?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology