Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Advanta HPZ-02 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 165 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: N Fera SU1 and HPZ-02 are level at 63.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire ANexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 165 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Advanta HPZ-02
Tire BAdvanta

HPZ-02

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    HPZ-02 +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1HPZ-02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests55≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6461

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 63.7 = 58

    HPZ-02: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    No road tests of dry for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 64

    Wet

    HPZ-02 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1HPZ-02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests62≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6766

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.2 + 40% × 67 = 64

    HPZ-02: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 67

    No road tests of wet for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    HPZ-02 +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1HPZ-02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4951

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58

    HPZ-02: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 59

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    N Fera SU1 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1HPZ-02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6558

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 64.9 = 65

    HPZ-02: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    N Fera SU1 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1HPZ-02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7061

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    HPZ-02: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 64

    No road tests of noise for HPZ-02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1HPZ-02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6061

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.5 = 66

    HPZ-02: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera SU1 +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1HPZ-02
    Reviews found online6659
  8. 76

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1HPZ-02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests76–
Scores at a glance
Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Advanta HPZ-02: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N Fera SU1Advanta HPZ-02
Relative Score 63 63
Dry 58 63
Wet 64 67
Snow 58 59
Comfort 65 61
Noise 69 64
Treadwear 66 63
Handling (owners) 66 59
Efficiency 76 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N Fera SU1

± 8

HPZ-02

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Tire B HPZ-02

Pros

  • Fabulous value and affordability for the price point
  • Surprinsingly good dry and wet grip for a standard road tire
  • Sharp handling and competent everyday performance

Cons

  • Durability issues, specifically sidewall bubbling reported on low-profile sizes
  • Potential vibration and structural integrity concerns under certain vehicle setups
All owner themes in the HPZ-02 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Fera SU1 B · Advanta HPZ-02
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9797
Rim diameters15″ – 24″16″ – 24″
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG300 A A420 A A
Treadwear warranty25,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common5555

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Fera SU1

Advanta HPZ-02

Too close to call: Nexen N Fera SU1 and Advanta HPZ-02 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera SU1 is stronger on handling, noise and comfort. Advanta HPZ-02 is stronger on dry and wet. Advanta HPZ-02 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 69 vs 64 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Advanta HPZ-02 scores 63 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire B · Advanta HPZ-02

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Fera SU1 or HPZ-02?

Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU1 or HPZ-02?

Advanta HPZ-02, 67 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU1 or HPZ-02?

Advanta HPZ-02, 63 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, N Fera SU1 or HPZ-02?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 59 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, N Fera SU1 or HPZ-02?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU1 or HPZ-02?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Fera SU1 or HPZ-02?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology