Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Nitto NT555 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 70–54

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nitto NT555
Tire ANitto

NT555

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 13 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +18
    75
    Why this score
    SourceNT555Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5280

    NT555: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 54

    Wet

    Advan Neova AD08 +15
    69
    Why this score
    SourceNT555Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4969

    NT555: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 54

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 42

    Snow

    Advan Neova AD08 +23
    65
    Why this score
    SourceNT555Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online2361

    NT555: 60% × 54.5 (est.) + 40% × 23.4 = 42

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Advan Neova AD08 +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourceNT555Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4967

    NT555: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 59

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for NT555 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Advan Neova AD08 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceNT555Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5468

    NT555: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 62

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for NT555 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    Advan Neova AD08 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceNT555Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4861

    NT555: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 48.1 = 55

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +25
    79
    Why this score
    SourceNT555Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online5479
Scores at a glance
Nitto NT555 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNitto NT555Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 54 70
Dry 57 75
Wet 54 69
Snow 42 65
Comfort 59 68
Noise 62 67
Treadwear 55 63
Handling (owners) 54 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

NT555

Advan Neova AD08

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A NT555

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and sticky, hot-tar-like road adhesion
  • Enhanced handling and high-speed stability
  • Sporty aesthetic and semi-slick feel favored by enthusiasts

Cons

  • Subpar wet weather traction and dangerous in winter/cold conditions
  • Can struggle to maintain traction on higher-horsepower vehicles (e.g., V8 setups)
  • Notable road noise that increases as the tire wears
All owner themes in the NT555 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nitto NT555 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available53—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth10.3/32″9/32″
UTQG300 A A180 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Nitto NT555

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nitto NT555 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 65 vs 42 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 69 vs 54 on wet.

Tire A · Nitto NT555
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

NT555 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, NT555 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 69 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, NT555 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, NT555 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 65 vs 42 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, NT555 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, NT555 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, NT555 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 63 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology