Head-to-head Updated

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 vs Nordman North 9 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 1 road tests and 11 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Hakkapeliitta 9 is ahead, 72–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Tire ANokian

Hakkapeliitta 9

Winter

± 6

Tests 72 · 5 tests Owners 74 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (ice braking)

Nordman North 9
Tire BNordman

North 9

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests 66 · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review

Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2024 Studded Tyre Test (ice traction)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 9North 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests6864
    Reviews found online7066

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 67.7 + 40% × 70.1 = 69

    North 9: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 65.9 = 64

  2. 73

    Wet

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 9North 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7067
    Reviews found online7772

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 77 = 73

    North 9: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 71.6 = 69

  3. 80

    Snow

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 9North 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests8372
    Reviews found online7571

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 75.4 = 80

    North 9: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 70.9 = 71

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 9North 9
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    North 9: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 57

    Noise

    North 9 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 9North 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests5157
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 50.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 57

    North 9: 60% × 56.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 9North 9
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7763

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 73

    North 9: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta 9. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for North 9. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 9North 9
    Reviews found online7067
  8. 65

    Efficiency

    North 9 +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 9North 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests6575
Scores at a glance
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 vs Nordman North 9: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNokian Hakkapeliitta 9Nordman North 9
Relative Score 72 67
Dry 69 64
Wet 73 69
Snow 80 71
Comfort 66 64
Noise 57 61
Treadwear 73 64
Handling (owners) 70 67
Efficiency 65 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Hakkapeliitta 9

± 8

North 9

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryHakkapeliitta 9North 9ΔHead-to-head
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 60% #3/8 · 2020 Studded Winter Tyre Test 60% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #6/8 · 2020 Studded Winter Tyre Test 92% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 96% #15/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test 97% #7/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Handling Snow 97% #3/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test 94% #7/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Traction Snow 97% #2/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test 83% #3/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 99% #8/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test 98% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 98% #4/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test 94% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 98% #6/8 · 2020 Studded Winter Tyre Test 96% #2/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/5 2021 Test World Winter Studded Tire Test R17 #6/8 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hakkapeliitta 9

Pros

  • Unmatched traction and braking performance on ice and packed snow
  • Secure, factory-installed studs that resist loss during use
  • Greatly improves winter drivability and confidence on steep hills and country roads

Cons

  • Noticeable and sometimes loud road noise from the studs on dry pavement
  • Flexy sidewalls causing a floating sensation on certain vehicle setups
  • Poor or loose handling characteristics in warmer, non-winter temperatures
All owner themes in the Hakkapeliitta 9 review

Tire B North 9

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 B · Nordman North 9
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth—12 - 13/32″
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9

Nordman North 9

Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 — better snow, treadwear and dry. Pick the Nordman North 9 if efficiency and noise matter most to you. Nordman North 9 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Nordman North 9 scores 75 vs 65 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 scores 80 vs 71 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 scores 69 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Tire B · Nordman North 9

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9?

Which is better in the wet, Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 73 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 69 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 80 vs 71 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9?

Nordman North 9, 61 vs 57 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Hakkapeliitta 9 or North 9?

Nordman North 9, 75 vs 65 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology