Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 80 · 12 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 4 road tests and 12 + 179 owner reviews. How we score
SeasonProof leads, 76–72 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 80 · 12 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)
Tests 72 · 4 tests Owners 60 · 179 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2020 AutoBild Van All Season Commercial Tyre Test (wet handling)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 4 tests | 64 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
SeasonProof: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 77.9 = 70
VanContact 4Season: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 68.9 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of dry for VanContact 4Season. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 4 tests | 73 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 81 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
SeasonProof: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 80.9 = 76
VanContact 4Season: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 70.8 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of wet for VanContact 4Season. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 4 tests | 92 | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | ≈ 74 (est.) |
SeasonProof: 60% × 92.4 + 40% × 79.8 = 87
VanContact 4Season: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 73.7 (est.) = 78
No owner ratings of snow for VanContact 4Season. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
SeasonProof: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79 = 76
VanContact 4Season: 40% × 78.1 + 60% × 70.5 (est.) = 74
No road tests of comfort for SeasonProof. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of comfort for VanContact 4Season. The owner half is the owners’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 3 tests | 81 | 62 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
SeasonProof: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75
VanContact 4Season: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
No owner ratings of noise for SeasonProof or VanContact 4Season. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 74 | – |
| Reviews found online | 84 | – |
SeasonProof: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 83.8 = 78
| Source | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | – |
| Source | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 3 tests | 74 | 80 |
| Category | Nokian SeasonProof | Continental VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 72 |
| Dry | 70 | 70 |
| Wet | 76 | 71 |
| Snow | 87 | 78 |
| Comfort | 76 | 74 |
| Noise | 75 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 78 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | – |
| Efficiency | 74 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
SeasonProof
VanContact 4Season
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | SeasonProof | VanContact 4Season | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | Dry | 91% #4/8 · 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 | 67% #3/4 · 2022 Auto Bild Reisemobil Commercial All-Season Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #9/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 95% #5/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #12/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 | 100% #1/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 92% #4/8 · 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 | 91% #5/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 87% #8/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 82% #6/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet | Wet | 84% #6/8 · 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 | 67% #2/4 · 2022 Auto Bild Reisemobil Commercial All-Season Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% #12/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 94% #5/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 96% #9/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #10/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 75% #4/8 · 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 | 100% #1/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow | Snow | 97% #2/8 · 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 | 100% #1/4 · 2022 Auto Bild Reisemobil Commercial All-Season Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 100% #1/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 99% #2/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% #6/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 99% #3/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 94% #2/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 99% #2/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 97% #6/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 99% #2/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 97% #6/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% #5/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 94% #2/6 · promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 68% #7/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | 61% #8/8 · 2020 AutoBild Van All Season Commercial Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/12 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test | #1/6 promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Nokian SeasonProof | B · Continental VanContact 4Season |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Van |
| Sizes available | 39 | 23 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Nokian SeasonProof
Continental VanContact 4Season
Narrow edge: Nokian SeasonProof — better noise, snow and wet. Pick the Continental VanContact 4Season if efficiency matters most to you.
Nokian SeasonProof scores 75 vs 64 on noise.
Nokian SeasonProof scores 87 vs 78 on snow.
Continental VanContact 4Season scores 80 vs 74 on efficiency.
Nokian SeasonProof scores 76 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Nokian SeasonProof, 76 vs 71 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Nokian SeasonProof, 87 vs 78 on our snow score.
Nokian SeasonProof, 75 vs 64 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Continental VanContact 4Season, 80 vs 74 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology