Head-to-head Updated

Nordman North 9 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 5 road tests and 1 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Hakkapeliitta 9 is ahead, 73–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nordman North 9
Tire ANordman

North 9

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests 66 · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review

Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2024 Studded Tyre Test (ice traction)

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Tire BNokian

Hakkapeliitta 9

Winter

± 6

Tests 72 · 5 tests Owners 75 · 12 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (ice braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6468
    Reviews found online6672

    North 9: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 65.9 = 64

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 67.7 + 40% × 72.4 = 70

  2. 69

    Wet

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +5
    74
    Why this score
    SourceNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6770
    Reviews found online7279

    North 9: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 79.1 = 74

  3. 71

    Snow

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +10
    81
    Why this score
    SourceNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests7283
    Reviews found online7176

    North 9: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 81

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6367

    North 9: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for North 9. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta 9. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    North 9 +3
    57
    Why this score
    SourceNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests5750
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    North 9: 60% × 56.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 60

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 50.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 57

    No owner ratings of noise for North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6378

    North 9: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 64

    Hakkapeliitta 9: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for North 9. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta 9. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Hakkapeliitta 9 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9
    Reviews found online6772
  8. 75

    Efficiency

    North 9 +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7565
Scores at a glance
Nordman North 9 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNordman North 9Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Relative Score 67 73
Dry 64 70
Wet 69 74
Snow 71 81
Comfort 64 68
Noise 60 57
Treadwear 64 73
Handling (owners) 67 72
Efficiency 75 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

North 9

± 6

Hakkapeliitta 9

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryNorth 9Hakkapeliitta 9ΔHead-to-head
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 60% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test 60% #3/8 · 2020 Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test 96% #6/8 · 2020 Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #7/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test 96% #15/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Handling Snow 94% #7/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test 97% #3/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Traction Snow 83% #3/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test 97% #2/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 98% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test 99% #8/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 94% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test 98% #4/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% #2/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test 98% #6/8 · 2020 Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/8 2024 Studded Tyre Test #3/5 2021 Test World Winter Studded Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A North 9

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Hakkapeliitta 9

Pros

  • Unmatched traction and braking performance on ice and packed snow
  • Secure, factory-installed studs that resist loss during use
  • Greatly improves winter drivability and confidence on steep hills and country roads

Cons

  • Noticeable and sometimes loud road noise from the studs on dry pavement
  • Flexy sidewalls causing a floating sensation on certain vehicle setups
  • Poor or loose handling characteristics in warmer, non-winter temperatures
All owner themes in the Hakkapeliitta 9 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nordman North 9 B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth12 - 13/32″—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nordman North 9

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9

Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 — better snow, treadwear and dry. Pick the Nordman North 9 if efficiency and noise matter most to you. Nordman North 9 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Nordman North 9 scores 75 vs 65 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 scores 81 vs 71 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 scores 70 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Nordman North 9
Tire B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9?

Which is better in the wet, North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 70 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 81 vs 71 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9?

Nordman North 9, 60 vs 57 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 68 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, North 9 or Hakkapeliitta 9?

Nordman North 9, 75 vs 65 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology