Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 21 reviews
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P6 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 21 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: CINTURA/TO P6 66, BluEarth RV02 65.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 65 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
CINTURA/TO P6 +662Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P6 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 69 68 CINTURA/TO P6: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 67.6 = 62
No road tests of dry for CINTURA/TO P6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
CINTURA/TO P6 +269Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P6 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 71 72 CINTURA/TO P6: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 67 + 40% × 72.2 = 69
No road tests of wet for CINTURA/TO P6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Comfort
BluEarth RV02 +466Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P6 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 59 69 CINTURA/TO P6: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.2 = 62
BluEarth RV02: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 69 = 66
No road tests of comfort for CINTURA/TO P6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P6 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 64 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) BluEarth RV02: 60% × 64.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth RV02. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
60
Treadwear
BluEarth RV02 +161Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P6 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 56 52 CINTURA/TO P6: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 60
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 51.9 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for CINTURA/TO P6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
58
Handling (owners)
BluEarth RV02 +1169Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P6 BluEarth RV02 Reviews found online 58 69 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P6 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Pirelli CINTURA/TO P6 | Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 65 |
| Dry | 68 | 62 |
| Wet | 71 | 69 |
| Comfort | 62 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 69 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CINTURA/TO P6
BluEarth RV02
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CINTURA/TO P6
Pros
- Strong dry and wet surface grip
- Responsive handling and cornering control
- Good impact absorption and ride comfort
Cons
- Excessive road noise and droning at highway speeds
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
- Tendency for rubber to harden and crack over time
Tire B BluEarth RV02
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
Cons
- Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Pirelli CINTURA/TO P6 | B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 5 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 16″ | 17″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P6
Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Too close to call: Pirelli CINTURA/TO P6 and Yokohama BluEarth RV02 are within 2 points overall. Pirelli CINTURA/TO P6 is stronger on dry. Yokohama BluEarth RV02 is stronger on handling and comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 69 vs 58 on handling.
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P6 scores 68 vs 62 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CINTURA/TO P6 or BluEarth RV02?
Which is better in the wet, CINTURA/TO P6 or BluEarth RV02?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, CINTURA/TO P6 or BluEarth RV02?
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P6, 68 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, CINTURA/TO P6 or BluEarth RV02?
Yokohama BluEarth RV02, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CINTURA/TO P6 or BluEarth RV02?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 61 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology