Head-to-head Updated

Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus vs Falken Ziez ZE950 AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
Tire BFalken

Ziez ZE950 AS

All Season High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceP4 Four Seasons PlusZiez ZE950 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online60–

    P4 Four Seasons Plus: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    No road tests of dry for P4 Four Seasons Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 65

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceP4 Four Seasons PlusZiez ZE950 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    P4 Four Seasons Plus: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65

    No road tests of wet for P4 Four Seasons Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceP4 Four Seasons PlusZiez ZE950 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online58–

    P4 Four Seasons Plus: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 62

    No road tests of snow for P4 Four Seasons Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceP4 Four Seasons PlusZiez ZE950 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    P4 Four Seasons Plus: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 61.6 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for P4 Four Seasons Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceP4 Four Seasons PlusZiez ZE950 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    P4 Four Seasons Plus: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 69

    No road tests of noise for P4 Four Seasons Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceP4 Four Seasons PlusZiez ZE950 AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    P4 Four Seasons Plus: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for P4 Four Seasons Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceP4 Four Seasons PlusZiez ZE950 AS
    Reviews found online57–
Scores at a glance
Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus vs Falken Ziez ZE950 AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryPirelli P4 Four Seasons PlusFalken Ziez ZE950 AS
Relative Score 64 –
Dry 63 –
Wet 65 –
Snow 62 –
Comfort 64 –
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 67 –
Handling (owners) 57 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

P4 Four Seasons Plus

Ziez ZE950 AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A P4 Four Seasons Plus

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and slow, durable wear
  • Quiet and remarkably comfortable ride quality
  • Strong handling and grip in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Can occasionally feel a bit loose or slip when pushed hard in heavy rain or snow
  • Ride can feel slightly stiff on certain vehicles
  • Isolated complaints regarding unexpected road noise
All owner themes in the P4 Four Seasons Plus review

Tire B Ziez ZE950 AS

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise levels

Cons

  • Limited tread life warranty compared to some competitors
  • Potential trade-off between handling performance and longevity
All owner themes in the Ziez ZE950 AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus B · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth12/32″—
UTQG760 A B—
Treadwear warranty90,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS

Only Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus
Tire B · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology