Head-to-head Updated

Toyo R888 R vs Yokohama A008P — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 31 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

A008P is ahead, 68–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo R888 R
Tire AToyo

R888 R

Summer

± 7

Tests 65 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 31 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test (dry handling)

Yokohama A008P
Tire BYokohama

A008P

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    R888 R +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceR888 RA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests76≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7372

    R888 R: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 72.9 = 75

    A008P: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 71

    No road tests of dry for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 55

    Wet

    A008P +11
    66
    Why this score
    SourceR888 RA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests53≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5964

    R888 R: 60% × 52.9 + 40% × 59 = 55

    A008P: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of wet for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    51
    Why this score
    SourceR888 RA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–37

    A008P: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 36.9 = 51

    No road tests of snow for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    A008P +12
    70
    Why this score
    SourceR888 RA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5371

    R888 R: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 52.8 = 58

    A008P: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for R888 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceR888 RA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    A008P: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 62

    No road tests of noise for A008P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    A008P +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceR888 RA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4658

    R888 R: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54

    A008P: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for R888 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceR888 RA008P
    Reviews found online7171
Scores at a glance
Toyo R888 R vs Yokohama A008P: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo R888 RYokohama A008P
Relative Score 63 68
Dry 75 71
Wet 55 66
Snow – 51
Comfort 58 70
Noise – 62
Treadwear 54 61
Handling (owners) 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

R888 R

± 8

A008P

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A R888 R

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
  • Sharp, communicative steering feedback
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Poor performance and potential for aquaplaning in standing water
All owner themes in the R888 R review

Tire B A008P

Pros

  • Exceptional handling and high-speed stability, with one reviewer saying the tires could go faster than the car allowed
  • Quiet operation, noted by a a retailer reviewer
  • Strong driver confidence and road feel, with one owner saying they carried more speed through corners

Cons

  • Difficulty balancing, reported by two reviewers
  • Road force balancing revealed tires out of spec, including one that could not be balanced and two that were way out of spec in another set
  • Vibration and shaking persisted after standard balancing attempts and suspension component changes
All owner themes in the A008P review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo R888 R B · Yokohama A008P
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available453
Rim diameters13″ – 20″16″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG100 A A240 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo R888 R

Yokohama A008P

Winner: Yokohama A008P — better comfort, wet and treadwear. Pick the Toyo R888 R if dry matters most to you. Yokohama A008P rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama A008P scores 70 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama A008P scores 66 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama A008P scores 61 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo R888 R scores 75 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Toyo R888 R
Tire B · Yokohama A008P

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

R888 R or A008P?

Which is better in the wet, R888 R or A008P?

Yokohama A008P, 66 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, R888 R or A008P?

Toyo R888 R, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, R888 R or A008P?

Yokohama A008P, 70 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, R888 R or A008P?

Yokohama A008P, 61 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology