tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Quatrac 3 vs Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 58 + 974 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac 3 is ahead, 71–63

Check price on Amazon · Quatrac 3 or BluEarth-4S AW21 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth-4S AW21

All Season

Tests 58 · 5 tests Owners 64 · 974 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 16 in 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Quatrac 3 +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 68 (est.)55
    Reviews found online6966

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 65.5 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Quatrac 3 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 74 (est.)71
    Reviews found online7873

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 75

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 76

    Snow

    Quatrac 3 +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 73 (est.)67
    Reviews found online8067

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 76

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    No road tests of snow for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Quatrac 3 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6962

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 3 or BluEarth-4S AW21. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    53
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–44
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 43.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 53

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth-4S AW21. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Quatrac 3 +18
    48
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)46
    Reviews found online6651

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 46.2 + 40% × 51.3 = 48

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac 3 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3BluEarth-4S AW21
    Reviews found online7163
Scores at a glance
CategoryVredestein Quatrac 3Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
Relative Score 71 63
Dry 68 59
Wet 75 72
Snow 76 67
Comfort 69 66
Noise – 53
Treadwear 66 48
Handling (owners) 71 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Quatrac 3

BluEarth-4S AW21

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryQuatrac 3BluEarth-4S AW21ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #35/54 2013 54 Tyre Braking Test #6/7 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quatrac 3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and slush
  • Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits

Cons

  • Develops significant road noise or rhythmic droning as tread wears down
  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, particularly on heavier vehicles
  • Slightly reduced dry-pavement grip and sharper cornering response compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac 3 review

Tire B BluEarth-4S AW21

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability on wet and flooded roads
  • Strong traction and confidence-inspiring performance in snow and ice
  • Good value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher road noise levels ('howling' or noticeable hum) compared to some other brands
  • Softer cornering feel and reduced precision during hot summer months
  • Minor negative impact on fuel economy for some drivers
All owner themes in the BluEarth-4S AW21 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac 3 B · Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—104
Rim diameters—14″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Quatrac 3

Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac 3 — better treadwear, dry and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 66 vs 48 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 68 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 76 vs 67 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 71 vs 63 on handling.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac 3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quatrac 3 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Which is better in the wet, Quatrac 3 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Vredestein Quatrac 3, 75 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac 3 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Vredestein Quatrac 3, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Quatrac 3 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Vredestein Quatrac 3, 76 vs 67 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Quatrac 3 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Vredestein Quatrac 3, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Quatrac 3 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Vredestein Quatrac 3, 66 vs 48 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology