Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 37 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 71–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +14
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan dB V552Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5780

    Advan dB V552: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Advan Neova AD08 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan dB V552Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6169

    Advan dB V552: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan dB V552Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan dB V552Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6767

    Advan dB V552: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Advan dB V552 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan dB V552Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Advan Neova AD08 +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan dB V552Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5661

    Advan dB V552: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 60

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +19
    79
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan dB V552Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online6079
Scores at a glance
Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Advan dB V552Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 62 71
Dry 61 75
Wet 64 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 68 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 60 63
Handling (owners) 60 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advan dB V552

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advan dB V552

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
  • High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
  • Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
  • Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
  • Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
All owner themes in the Advan dB V552 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available45—
Rim diameters15″ – 21″—
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Advan dB V552

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 69 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 63 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama Advan dB V552
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advan dB V552 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Advan dB V552 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 69 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advan dB V552 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Advan dB V552 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Advan dB V552 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 63 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology