Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 31 + 425 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Advan Neova AD08 and Advan Sport V105S are level at 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Neova AD08Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8075

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Advan Sport V105S +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Neova AD08Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6976

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.3 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Neova AD08Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Neova AD08Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6767

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Advan Neova AD08 or Advan Sport V105S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Neova AD08Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Advan Sport V105S +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Neova AD08Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6165

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Neova AD08Advan Sport V105S
    Reviews found online7972
Scores at a glance
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Advan Neova AD08Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
Relative Score 71 71
Dry 75 72
Wet 69 75
Snow 65 –
Comfort 68 68
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 63 65
Handling (owners) 79 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advan Neova AD08

Advan Sport V105S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Tire B Advan Sport V105S

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning
  • Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering response and direct feedback

Cons

  • Shorter tread life or faster-than-average wear noted by some users
  • Stiffer sidewall results in a firmer, less plush ride quality
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the Advan Sport V105S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG180 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Yokohama Advan Sport V105S

Too close to call: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 and Yokohama Advan Sport V105S are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on handling and dry. Yokohama Advan Sport V105S is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 72 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 75 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 72 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advan Neova AD08 or Advan Sport V105S?

Which is better in the wet, Advan Neova AD08 or Advan Sport V105S?

Yokohama Advan Sport V105S, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advan Neova AD08 or Advan Sport V105S?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Advan Neova AD08 or Advan Sport V105S?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Advan Neova AD08 or Advan Sport V105S?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology