Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Advan Sport AS vs Yokohama C Drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 15 + 45 owner reviews. How we score

C Drive is ahead, 71–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tire AYokohama

Advan Sport AS

All-Season tire

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 64 · 15 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Yokohama C Drive
Tire BYokohama

C Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 45 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 51

    Dry

    C Drive +20
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Sport ASC Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests42≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6473

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 64.4 = 51

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71

    No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    C Drive +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Sport ASC Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests57≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 67.6 = 61

    C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 58

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Sport ASC Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online50–

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    C Drive +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Sport ASC Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6874

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 67.9 = 65

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for C Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Sport ASC Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online67–

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 67.3 = 70

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Advan Sport AS +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Sport ASC Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests79≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 63.7 = 73

    C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    C Drive +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan Sport ASC Drive
    Reviews found online6672
Scores at a glance
Yokohama Advan Sport AS vs Yokohama C Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Advan Sport ASYokohama C Drive
Relative Score 61 71
Dry 51 71
Wet 61 74
Snow 58 –
Comfort 65 72
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 73 66
Handling (owners) 66 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advan Sport AS

C Drive

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advan Sport AS

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
  • Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
  • Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
  • Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
All owner themes in the Advan Sport AS review

Tire B C Drive

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable, progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
  • Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
  • Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
All owner themes in the C Drive review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Advan Sport AS B · Yokohama C Drive
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG440 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS

Yokohama C Drive

Winner: Yokohama C Drive — better dry, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama C Drive scores 71 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama C Drive scores 74 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advan Sport AS or C Drive?

Which is better in the wet, Advan Sport AS or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 74 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advan Sport AS or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 71 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Advan Sport AS or C Drive?

Yokohama C Drive, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Advan Sport AS or C Drive?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology