Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Sport V103 is ahead, 79–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
Advan Sport V103 +1763Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 87 61 Advan Sport V103: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 86.6 = 80
C Drive2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63
No road tests of dry for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
82
Wet
Advan Sport V103 +1567Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 79 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 86 66 Advan Sport V103: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.8 = 82
C Drive2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67
No road tests of wet for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
76
Comfort
Advan Sport V103 +868Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 82 66 Advan Sport V103: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 76
C Drive2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Advan Sport V103 or C Drive2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Advan Sport V103 +962Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 74 60 Advan Sport V103: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 71
C Drive2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
85
Handling (owners)
Advan Sport V103 +2461Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 C Drive2 Reviews found online 85 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan Sport V103 | Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 64 |
| Dry | 80 | 63 |
| Wet | 82 | 67 |
| Comfort | 76 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Advan Sport V103
64
/ 100
C Drive2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan Sport V103
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and progressive handling at the limit
- Comfortable ride with low noise levels
- Sharper and more acute steering response
Cons
- Sudden drop-off in performance once the tread reaches its wear limit, particularly on the inside edges
- Limited specific feedback on extreme wet weather limits compared to dry performance
Tire B C Drive2
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
- Low road noise levels
- Strong wet weather performance for most users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
- Sudden loss of grip at the limit
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan Sport V103 | B · Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 21 | 3 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Yokohama Advan Sport V103
64
/ 100
Yokohama C Drive2
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan Sport V103 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 85 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 80 vs 63 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 82 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan Sport V103
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan Sport V103 or C Drive2?
Which is better in the wet, Advan Sport V103 or C Drive2?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 82 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan Sport V103 or C Drive2?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 80 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Advan Sport V103 or C Drive2?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 76 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advan Sport V103 or C Drive2?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology