Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews
Yokohama Bluearth E51 vs Sumitomo BC100 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BC100 leads, 58–56 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Bluearth E51 +154Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BC100 Professional tests (TWG score) – 55 Reviews found online 48 54 -
57
Wet
BC100 +259Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BC100 Professional tests (TWG score) – 57 Reviews found online 53 62 -
54
Comfort
BC100 +1064Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BC100 Reviews found online 38 59 -
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BC100 Professional tests (TWG score) – 67 -
64
Treadwear
Bluearth E51 +361Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BC100 Reviews found online 63 58 -
45
Handling
BC100 +1156Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BC100 Reviews found online 45 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Bluearth E51 | Sumitomo BC100 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 58 |
| Dry | 55 | 54 |
| Wet | 57 | 59 |
| Comfort | 54 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 61 |
| Handling | 45 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Bluearth E51
BC100
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Bluearth E51
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
Tire B BC100
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong wet and dry grip for everyday commuting
- Good water dispersion and confidence in heavy rain
Cons
- Higher than average road noise reported by some drivers
- Occasional understeer or reduced grip during aggressive cornering
- Mixed experiences regarding longevity, with a few reporting faster-than-expected wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Bluearth E51 | B · Sumitomo BC100 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | 13″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Bluearth E51
Sumitomo BC100
Winner: Sumitomo BC100 — better handling and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Bluearth E51 if treadwear matters most to you.
Sumitomo BC100 scores 56 vs 45 on handling.
Sumitomo BC100 scores 64 vs 54 on comfort.
Yokohama Bluearth E51 scores 64 vs 61 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.