Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews
Yokohama Bluearth E51 vs Yokohama BluEarth E70 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth E70 leads, 59–56 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
BluEarth E70 +358Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 48 53 -
57
Wet
BluEarth E70 +562Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 53 59 -
54
Comfort
BluEarth E70 +155Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 38 40 -
64
Treadwear
Bluearth E51 +163Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 63 61 -
45
Handling
BluEarth E70 +651Why this score
Source Bluearth E51 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 45 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Bluearth E51 | Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 59 |
| Dry | 55 | 58 |
| Wet | 57 | 62 |
| Comfort | 54 | 55 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 63 |
| Handling | 45 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Bluearth E51
BluEarth E70
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Bluearth E51
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
Tire B BluEarth E70
Pros
- Excellent tread life and durability
- Predictable handling in dry conditions
- Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
Cons
- High levels of cabin noise on various road surfaces
- Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Bluearth E51 | B · Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | 17″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Bluearth E51
Yokohama BluEarth E70
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth E70 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth E70 scores 51 vs 45 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth E70 scores 62 vs 57 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth E70 scores 58 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.